Enslein v. Hudson & Manhattan R. Co.

CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
CitationEnslein v. Hudson & Manhattan R. Co., 180 N.Y.S.2d 299, 5 N.Y.2d 778, 154 N.E.2d 558 (N.Y. 1958)
Decision Date16 October 1958
Parties, 154 N.E.2d 558 Meta ENSLEIN, Respondent-Appellant, v. HUDSON & MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant-Respondent, the Peelle Company, Defendant-Appellant, and Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Defendant.

Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, 6 A.D.2d 833, 176 N.Y.S.2d 70.

Passenger, who was injured in fall on escalator at railroad station, and who subsequently fractured her hip in fall in living room of her home, brought action against company, which installed the escalator, first railroad, which owned the station and had leased it to second railroad, and second railroad, to recover for injuries.

The Supreme Court, Trial Term, Kings County, Louis L. Friedman, J., 8 Misc.2d 87, 165 N.Y.S.2d 630, entered judgment in favor of the passenger for $50,000 plus out-of-pocket special damages against company, which installed the escalator, and the second railroad, and they appealed.

The Appellate Division, 6 A.D.2d 833, 176 N.Y.S.2d 70, affirmed the judgment in part and reversed it in part, unless passenger should agree to reduce verdict to $6,000. Beldock, J., dissented.

The passenger, the company, which had installed the escalator, and the second railroad appealed to the Court of...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Borgia v. City of New York
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • December 31, 1962
    ...reviewable since he stipulated to such reduction and, accordingly, is not a 'party aggrieved' (see Enselin v. Hudson & Manhattan R. R. Co., 5 N.Y.2d 778, 180 N.Y.S.2d 299, 154 N.E.2d 558; Civ.Prac.Act, § Plaintiffs' appeals discussed in the paragraph next above should be dismissed. The judg......
  • Enslein v. Hudson & Manhattan R. Co.
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • April 9, 1959
    ...the Court of Appeals, and motions were made in the Court of Appeals to dismiss the appeal of the passenger. The Court of Appeals, 5 N.Y.2d 778, 180 N.Y.S.2d 299, granted the motions to dismiss the appeal of the passenger, on ground that the passenger was not a party aggrieved within meaning......
  • Rumph v. Gotham Ford, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 7, 1974
    ...not parties aggrieved. Borgia v. City of New York, 12 N.Y.2d 151, 237 N.Y.S.2d 319, 187 N.E.2d 777; Enslein v. Hudson & Manhattan R.R. Co., 5 N.Y.2d 778, 180 N.Y.S.2d 299, 154 N.E.2d 558. However, the plaintiffs, who have stipulated to the reduction, have the right to argue, on the defendan......
  • Gilroy v. American Broadcasting Company, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • December 19, 1977
    ...dismissed upon the ground that plaintiff is not a party aggrieved (see, e. g., Enslein v. Hudson & Manhattan R. R. Co., 5 N.Y.2d 778, 180 N.Y.S.2d 299, 154 N.E.2d 558, 58 A.D.2d 533, 395 N.Y.S.2d 658. ...
  • Get Started for Free