Enterprise City Bd. of Ed. v. Miller

Decision Date29 July 1977
PartiesENTERPRISE CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION v. Lonnie B. MILLER, as Adm'r. of the Estate of Leslie Ann Miller, Deceased. SC 2333.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Alan C. Livingston of Lee & McInish, Dothan, Kenneth T. Fuller of Cassady, Fuller & Marsh, Enterprise, for appellant.

L. Andrew Hollis, Jr., of Hollis & Dowling, Enterprise, for appellee.

SHORES, Justice.

This appeal arises from an action for wrongful death of a 6-year-old child who was struck and killed by a school bus owned and operated by the Enterprise City Board of Education. The Board filed a motion for summary judgment claiming immunity from suit. The trial court denied the motion but certified its interlocutory order to allow this appeal pursuant to ARAP 5.

The sole issue presented is whether city boards of education are subject to suit in tort actions after this court's decision in Jackson v. City of Florence, 294 Ala. 592, 320 So.2d 68 (1975), as the plaintiff contends, or whether they are immune from such suits as county boards of education were held to be in Sims v. Etowah County Board of Education, Ala., 337 So.2d 1310 (1976).

Jackson was based upon this court's construction of Title 37, §§ 502-504. We held there that the legislature had removed the common law immunity as to municipalities and that the court had erroneously interpreted those legislative acts.

It is quite clear that Jackson and Lorence v. Hospital Board of Morgan County, 294 Ala. 614, 320 So.2d 631 (1975), are based upon legislative interpretation. The court recognized in both of these cases, and in subsequent ones, that the legislature is the appropriate body to make policy in the field of governmental immunity; and, unless contrary to the constitution, it is our function to uphold the legislative will in areas appropriate for its action. The holding in Sims, supra, that a county board of education was immune to suits in tort because of the absence of statutory authorization for such suits, was based upon recognition of the legislature's prerogative in this field.

City boards of education are authorized by the legislature. Title 52, § 148, et seq.

Like county school boards, they are agencies of the state, empowered to administer public education within the cities. As such, a city school board is not a subdivision or agency of the municipal government. Opinion of the Justices, 276 Ala. 239, 160 So.2d 648 (1964). A city school board's relation to the city is analogous to a county school board's relation to the county. State v. Brandon, 244 Ala. 62, 12 So.2d 319 (1943).

There is no mention in the statutes under which city school boards are created of the ability to be sued. Title 52, § 168, allows a...

To continue reading

Request your trial
40 cases
  • Shumate v. Selma City Bd. of Educ.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Alabama
    • March 4, 2013
    ...by consent.” Patterson, 835 So.2d at 142–43. It is also clear that the Board is an arm of the state. In Enterprise City Board of Education v. Miller, 348 So.2d 782 (Ala.1977), the Alabama Supreme Court held that city boards of education were immune from civil actions: City boards of educati......
  • Smith v. DALLAS CTY. BD. OF ED., Civ. A. No. 79-0260-H.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Alabama
    • December 10, 1979
    ...(Ala.1978) (tort liability exists because the Mobile County School Bd. is empowered to both sue and be sued); Enterprise City Bd. of Educ. v. Miller, 348 So.2d 782 (Ala.1977) (no tort actions against a city school board because Ala.Code, which created city school boards, does not mention an......
  • Keith v. Talladega City Bd. of Educ., Case No. 1:18-CV-01311-KOB
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Alabama
    • March 10, 2021
    ...statute required her to receive a right-to-sue letter not from the EEOC, but from the Attorney General. See Enterprise City Bd. of Educ. v. Miller, 348 So. 2d 782, 783 (Ala. 1977) (holding that city school Boards are "agencies of the state"). But the EEOC—as opposed to the Attorney General—......
  • Chandler v. Hospital Authority of City of Huntsville
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • September 5, 1986
    ...a remedy for his injuries. For example, both city and county school boards are immune from tort actions. See Enterprise City Board of Education v. Miller, 348 So.2d 782 (Ala.1977); Sims v. Etowah County Board of Education, 337 So.2d 1310 (Ala.1976). Municipal airports are immune from tort a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT