Enyart v. State Comp. Comm'r

• Decision Date: 12 November 1930
• Docket Number: No. 6862.,6862.
• Parties: ENYART. v. STATE COMPENSATION COMMISSIONER.
• Court: West Virginia Supreme Court

155 S.E. 913

ENYART.
v.
STATE COMPENSATION COMMISSIONER.

No. 6862.

Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.

Nov. 12, 1930.

Syllabus by the Court.

Where an allowance for temporary disability is awarded and paid to a claimant under workmen's compensation fund, and thereafter he seeks further compensation which is denied by the commissioner who notifies claimant that the "claim remains closed, " and the claimant then takes no further steps in the matter for nearly four months, he thereby loses his right to have the matter reviewed in this court, because of failure of compliance with requirements of section 43, c. 71, Acts of Legislature of 1929. As a preliminary to appellate proceedings, that section requires the claimant to object to such adverse finding within ten days after receipt of notice thereof, and provides for a fur ther hearing by the commissioner following such objection by the claimant. Then, if final action of the commissioner be adverse to the claimant, the statute permits him to apply to the Supreme Court of Appeals for "a review of the record and such decision within ninety days."

Proceeding under the Workmen's Compensation Act by Everett Enyart. On appeal from a decision of the Compensation Commissioner refusing to reopen the case for purpose of awarding further compensation, claimant appeals.

Affirmed.

W. L. Taylor, of Logan, for appellant.

Howard B. Lee, Atty. Gen., and R. Dennis Steed, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

MAXWELL, J.

In the course of his employment claimant was injured in a mine of the West Virginia Coal & Coke Company, at Omar, Logan county, the 14th day of February, 1929.' He was allowed compensation from the date of his injury to the 1st day of June, 1929, at which time he was supposed to be able to return to work, at least, that was the medical opinion upon which the commissioner acted. The claimant himself wrote the commissioner under date of July 1, 1929: "I am now ready to go to work or expect to within the next few days." In the same letter, however, he asserted that his right ankle was crooked, and that he should have further compensation. Within a few days after the receipt of this letter, the commissioner replied thereto and sent to claimant a form upon which claimant's physician could make a further report. Such report was not made, but, on the 11th of September, claimant appeared in person at the office of the State Compensation Commissioner at Charleston, bearing a letter of Dr. L. W. Lawson of Logan, addressed to...