Epps v. State
| Decision Date | 21 July 1982 |
| Docket Number | No. 52258,52258 |
| Citation | 417 So.2d 543 |
| Parties | Johnny Lee EPPS v. STATE of Mississippi. |
| Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
Alan M. Hathorne, Jackson, for appellant.
Bill Allain, Atty. Gen. by Amy D. Whitten, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.
Before WALKER, P. J., and BROOM and ROY NOBLE LEE, JJ.
Johnny Lee Epps was convicted in the Circuit Court of the First Judicial District of Hinds County, Honorable Dan M. Lee, presiding, for the unlawful sale of cocaine, and was sentenced to a term of twenty-five (25) years with the Mississippi Department of Corrections, twenty (20) years being suspended, with five (5) years to serve, and five (5) years probation.
Epps has appealed to this Court and assigns two (2) errors in the trial below. We consider only the assigned error as to whether or not the trial court erred in refusing appellant's request for a peremptory instruction of not guilty because of entrapment, and we reverse.
According to the State's evidence, on March 27, 1979, Detective L. C. Russell and Alex Butler, a confidential informant, went to the home of Mary Jackson. Butler told Detective Russell that Miss Jackson would take him to a known drug dealer in the area where he could purchase cocaine. Detective Russell accompanied Miss Jackson to the home of appellant where they knocked on the door and Epps came out. Miss Jackson asked Epps whether he had any "stuff" left and appellant said that he had a "small piece" which was of a "top grain." Detective Russell and Miss Jackson agreed to purchase the cocaine. Epps went inside and returned with a small paper package which he handed to Miss Jackson, who passed it over to Detective Russell. He examined the contents, was convinced that it was narcotic and gave Epps sixty dollars ($60.00) for the substance. It was identified as cocaine at the police station. Subsequently, appellant was arrested on September 5, 1979 (five months later) and was charged with the sale of cocaine.
At trial, appellant testified that the cocaine was supplied to him by the confidential informant, Alex Butler. Miss Jackson testified that Butler was her boyfriend and that he came to her home with Detective Russell and introduced him as a friend from Chicago. Further, that Butler asked her to go to Epps' home and purchase a gram of cocaine, to which she finally agreed.
Appellant corroborated Miss Jackson's testimony about details of the sale. He further testified that two days before the sale, Alex Butler came to his home and asked him to hold some cocaine for him until Mary Jackson picked it up; that Butler told him Jackson would give him forty dollars ($40.00) for the cocaine; and that he would pick up the money later. According to him, Butler never came to appellant's home after the sale to collect the money.
The confidential informant, Alex Butler, did not testify at the trial, and the testimony of appellant to the effect that Alex Butler came to his home and asked him to hold some cocaine for him until Miss Jackson picked it up later is uncontradicted. Detective Russell stated that he did not know how appellant obtained the narcotic.
In Torrence v. State, 380 So.2d 248 (Miss.1980), the defendant relied upon entrapment as his defense. He contended that a police informer supplied the narcotics which provided the basis for the charges against him, and that such conduct constituted entrapment as a matter of law. In reversing the conviction and discharging Torrence, the Court said:
It is the defendant's sole contention that his uncontradicted testimony establishes entrapment as a matter of law, and, that the burden was on the state to rebut such evidence and the state failed to sustain that burden. This Court had the same question before it in the recent case of Sylar v. State, 340 So.2d 10 (Miss.1976). There it was shown that Sylar, after declining on several occasions, consented to a Mississippi Narcotics Bureau undercover agent's request to deliver a one-pound package of marijuana to a "friend," who was also an undercover agent. Sylar was also instructed to collect from the latter $120.00. Sylar consummated the sale and returned the state funds back to the first agent's residence. In reversing and discharging the defendant, the Court quoted with approval from State v. Talbot, 71 N.J. 160, 364 A.2d 9 (1976), wherein the New Jersey...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Sayre v. State, 57110
...State, 518 So.2d 565 (Miss.1988); Barnes v. State, 493 So.2d 313 (Miss.1986); Daniels v. State, 422 So.2d 289 (Miss.1982); Epps v. State, 417 So.2d 543 (Miss.1982); Torrence v. State, 380 So.2d 248 (Miss.1980); Sylar v. State, 340 So.2d 10 (Miss.1976); Jones v. State, supra; Casenote, Crimi......
-
Tanner v. State
...like effect are Robinson v. State, 508 So.2d 1067, 1069 (Miss.1987); Daniels v. State, 422 So.2d 289, 291-92 (Miss.1982); Epps v. State, 417 So.2d 543, 545 (Miss.1982); Torrence v. State, 380 So.2d 248, 250 (Miss.1980); Sylar v. State, 340 So.2d 10 (Miss.1976). B. Entrapment is a defense to......
-
Kemp v. State
...delivered the proceeds paid by the supposed buyer to the supposed seller. Properly, the Court reversed the conviction. In Epps v. State, 417 So.2d 543, 544 (Miss.1982), an informant asked the defendant to keep a quantity of cocaine until the informant's girlfriend came to retrieve it. The g......
-
Robinson v. State, 56601
...him to "front" him twenty pounds of marijuana, in direct contradiction to Robinson's testimony. THE LAW Robinson relys upon Epps v. State, 417 So.2d 543 (Miss.1982) and Daniels v. State, 422 So.2d 289 (Miss.1982) as support for his position that because he had established entrapment as a ma......