Epstein v. Totten.

Decision Date18 February 1908
Citation63 W.Va. 602
CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court
PartiesEpstein v. Totten.

I. Writ of Error Final Judgment Jurisdiction.

There is no jurisdiction for a writ of error when there is a verdict for defendants and only a judgment for their costs, (p. 603.)

Error to Circuit Court, Wyoming County.

Action by the state, for the use of Jacob Epstein, against

II. P. Totten and others. Verdict for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

Dismissed.

T. L. Henritze, for plaintiff in error.

Cook & Howard and Rrrz & Litz, for defendants in error.

Brannon, Judge:

This was an action of debt in the name of the State for the use of Jacob Epstein against H. P. Totten and others, sureties in a sheriff's bond. The case was tried by a jury, which rendered & verdict for the defendants. The judgment was only that the defendants recover of Epstein their costs. There was no judgment of nil capiat, that is, that the plaintiff take nothing by her suit. For want of a final judgment on the merits there is no jurisdiction for this writ of error, and therefore we dismiss it. Hannah v. Bank, 53 W. Va. 82; Ritchie Bank v. Bee, 60 Id. 386; Be Arm it v. Town of Whitmer, decided 14th January, 1908.

Dismissed.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT