Ernst v. Mechanics' & Metals Nat. Bank of City of New York
Decision Date | 09 December 1912 |
Docket Number | 55-- 127. |
Citation | 201 F. 664 |
Parties | ERNST et al. v. MECHANICS' & METALS NAT. BANK OF CITY OF NEW YORK. HOTCHKISS v. NATIONAL CITY BANK OF NEW YORK. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
[Copyrighted Material Omitted]
Joline Larkin & Rathbone, of New York City (L. H. Freedman, Adrian H. Larkin, and Leland B. Garretson, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellant Mechanics' & Metals Nat. Bank.
Shearman & Sterling and John A. Garver, all of New York City, for appellant National City Bank.
William A. Barber, of New York City (Abram I. Elkus, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant Hotchkiss.
Hays Hershfield & Wolf, of New York City (Daniel P. Hays and Edwin D. Hays, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellees.
As to the Ernst Case:
Before LACOMBE, COXE, and WARD, Circuit Judges.
As to the Hotchkiss Case:
Before LACOMBE, WARD, and NOYES, Circuit Judges.
These cases are alike in respect to the main question involved, which is said to be of great importance to the business of stockbrokers in New York City and may be disposed of together as to it. Certain features in which they differ will be considered separately.
January 19, 1910, between 12 and 1 o'clock, the stockbroking firms of J. M. Fiske & Co. and Lathrop, Haskins & Co. failed, as the result of the collapse of a pool or pools in the stock of the Columbus & Hocking Valley Coal & Iron Company.
At the beginning of banking hours on that day Fiske & Co. had arranged for a day or clearance loan of $400,000 from the Mechanics, now the Mechanics' & Metals National Bank, and Lathrop, Haskins & Co. had arranged for one of $500,000 from the National City Bank. The banks, becoming uneasy about the financial condition of the brokers as the day progressed, demanded security for their accounts and obtained from each a large quantity of collaterals. Between 12 and 1 o'clock the firms notified the Stock Exchange that they were unable to meet their engagements, and subsequently each was adjudicated a bankrupt. The trustee of each estate brought a plenary action in equity for recovery of the securities or their value as a preference voidable by him under section 60 of the Bankruptcy Act and also in the case of Fiske & Co. for some $54,000 in cash deposited by them on the morning of the 19th in their account with the bank. The proceedings were referred to a special master, who took testimony and reported that each transaction was a voidable preference and directed the banks to account for the securities and cash to the trustees in bankruptcy of the failed firms. This report was confirmed by the District Court, and the banks have taken the appeals which are now to be disposed of.
Fiske & Co. had been dealing with the Mechanics' National Bank since November 8, 1901, under the following written contract:
On January 19th they applied for a day loan (which was granted), as follows:
'New York, January 19, 1910. 'Mechanics' National Bank, New York City:
'Please loan us to-day $400,000. Crediting this amount to our account, and oblige,
J. M. Fiske & Company'
On the same day Lathrop, Haskins & Co. applied to the National City Bank for a day loan of $500,000 and signed two notes differing only in amount, in the following form:
'$300,000.
New York City, January 19, 1910.
'On demand for value received we promise to pay to the National City Bank of New York, or order, three hundred thousand ($300,000) dollars, hereby agreeing that said bank shall have a lien upon all property of the undersigned now or hereafter in its possession or under its control, as security for any indebtedness of the undersigned now existing or hereafter contracted, with the right at any time to demand additional security, and with the right, upon default in payment, to sell, without advertisement or notice to the undersigned, any or all of the securities or property so held, at public expense or private sale, or to otherwise dispose of the same in the discretion of any of the officers of said bank, applying the proceeds upon the said indebtedness together with interest and expenses, legal or otherwise, the undersigned to be liable for any deficiency.
'Lathrop, Haskins & Co.'
The proofs show that in New York City contracts of brokers to deliver stock sold and to pay for stocks purchased must be carried out the next day and that credit from banks is absolutely necessary to enable them to release the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Griffin v. Nationwide Moving and Storage Co., Inc.
...399, 393 N.Y.S.2d 350, 361 N.E.2d 999; see also Hotchkiss v. National City Bank of New York, 200 F. 287, 293 (S.D.N.Y.1911), aff'd, 201 F. 664 (2d Cir. 1912), aff'd sub nom., National City Bank v. Hotchkiss, 231 U.S. 50, 34 S.Ct. 20, 58 L.Ed. 115 (1913). When the evidence is examined to det......
-
Alessi Equip., Inc. v. Am. Piledriving Equip., Inc.
...the personal, or individual, intent of the parties." Hotchkiss v. National City Bank , 200 F. 287, 293 (S.D.N.Y. 1911), aff'd , 201 F. 664 (2d Cir. 1912), aff'd , 231 U.S. 50, 34 S.Ct. 20, 58 L.Ed. 115 (1913). Indeed, the parties’ intent to be bound is determined based on the objective mani......
-
Charles O. Finley & Co., Inc. v. Kuhn
...by Judge Fairchild, Judge Learned Hand's statement in Hotchkiss v. National City Bank, 200 F. 287, 293-294 (S.D.N.Y.1911), aff'd 201 F. 664 (2d Cir. 1911).) Here, however, appellant argues that the Commissioner's action was an "abrupt departure from well established assignment practice and ......
-
Pan Am. World Airways, Inc. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.
...Realty Corp., 307 N.Y. 20, 25, 119 N.E.2d 573, 575 (1954); Hotchkiss v. National City Bank, 200 f. 287, 293 (S.D.N.Y.1911), aff'd, 201 F. 664 (2d Cir. 1912), aff'd, 231 U.S. 50, 34 S.Ct. 20, 58 L.Ed. 115 From this discussion it should be evident that if the district court erred in its appli......
-
Charting a course: how courts should interpret course of dealing in a battle-of-forms dispute.
...control their application and not their literal meaning. (168) (1.) Hotchkiss v. Nat'l City Bank, 200 F. 287, 293 (S.D.N.Y. 1911), aff'd, 201 F. 664 (2d Cir. 1912), aff'd 231 U.S. 50 (2.) Zachary R. Dowdy, Springfield Blast Hurts 12, Sends Debris Flying, BOSTON GLOBE, Feb. 26, 1999, at B2 (......