Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Holderman, A--95

• Decision Date: 04 March 1963
• Docket Number: No. A--95,A--95
• Citation: 188 A.2d 599,39 N.J. 355
• Parties: ESSO STANDARD OIL COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs, v. Carl HOLDERMAN, Commissioner, Department of Labor and Industry, State of New Jersey, Defendant. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. et al., Plaintiffs, v. Carl HOLDERMAN, Commissioner, Department of Labor and Industry, State of New Jersey, Defendant. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. et al., Plaintiffs, v. Raymond F. MALE, Commissioner, Department of Labor and Industry, State of New Jersey, Defendant.
• Court: New Jersey Supreme Court

Page 355

39 N.J. 355

188 A.2d 599

ESSO STANDARD OIL COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs, v. Carl HOLDERMAN, Commissioner, Department of Labor and Industry, State of New Jersey, Defendant.

NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. et al., Plaintiffs, v. Carl HOLDERMAN, Commissioner, Department of Labor and Industry, State of New Jersey, Defendant.

NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. et al., Plaintiffs, v. Raymond F. MALE, Commissioner, Department of Labor and Industry, State of New Jersey, Defendant.

No. A--95.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued Feb. 18, 1963.

Decided March 4, 1963.

John W. Fritz, Sommerville, and Edward B. Meredith, Trenton, for appellants (Wharton, Stewart & Davis, Sommerville, attorneys).

Theodore I. Botter, Trenton, for respondent (Arthur J. Sills, Atty. Gen., attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Conford in the Appellate Division.

For affirmance: Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN--6.

For reversal: None.