Estrada v. State

• Decision Date: 12 November 1924
• Docket Number: (No. 7476.)
• Citation: Estrada v. State, 268 S.W. 958, 99 Tex.Cr.R. 140 (Tex. Crim. App. 1924)
• Parties: ESTRADA v. STATE.
• Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals

268 S.W. 958

ESTRADA v. STATE.

(No. 7476.)

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

November 12, 1924.

Rehearing Denied February 11, 1925.

Appeal from District Court, Bastrop County; R. J. Alexander, Judge.

Aurellio Estrada was convicted of the unlawful transportation of intoxicating liquor, and he appeals. Affirmed.

R. A. Brooks, of Bastrop, for appellant.

R. G. Storey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

LATTIMORE, J.

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Bastrop county of the unlawful transportation of intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary.

There is no question under the facts but that appellant was guilty of carrying on a public road a bottle of whisky. Upon analysis it was found to contain 40 per cent. of alcohol, and its intoxicating quality was testified to by persons who tasted and examined same. The indictment contained two counts; one charging the transportation of intoxicating liquor, and the other the transportation of liquor containing more than 1 per cent. of alcohol by volume. The court submitted both counts to the jury and a general verdict was rendered, finding the appellant guilty as charged in the indictment. The judgment of the court was that appellant was guilty under the second count in the indictment.

The refusal of a special charge instructing the jury that, unless they found from the evidence that the liquor was transported for the purposes of sale or commercial purposes, appellant should be acquitted, was properly refused, as was likewise a request for a peremptory instruction.

There is a bill of exceptions to the overruling of a motion in arrest of judgment. The matters presented in the motion in arrest of judgment, if available, should have been presented in limine. They relate to complaints of the formation of the grand jury and of the petit...