Estrin Const. Co., Inc. v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co., No. WD
| Court | Court of Appeal of Missouri (US) |
| Writing for the Court | SHANGLER |
| Citation | 612 S.W.2d 413 |
| Parties | ESTRIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. The AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, Respondent. 31323. |
| Docket Number | No. WD |
| Decision Date | 02 February 1981 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
45 practice notes
-
US v. Conservation Chemical Co., No. 82-0983-CV-W-5.
...to property owned or occupied by an insured is excluded from coverage by CGL policies. Estrin Const. Co. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 612 S.W.2d 413 (Mo.App.1981), (distinguished liability coverage that relates to damage done by others and, for example, collision or builder's risk insurance wh......
-
Independent Petrochemical v. Aetna Cas. and Sur., Civ. A. No. 83-3347.
...which plaintiffs argue is the case here. Plaintiffs cite a Missouri Court of Appeals case, Estrin Const. Co., Inc. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur., 612 S.W.2d 413 (Mo.App.1981), as their sole support for this proposition. In Estrin, the court found that in adhesion contracts, the "printed words of a c......
-
National Mut. Ins. Co. v. McMahon & Sons, Inc., Nos. 17245
...Clause, 6 Hous.L.Rev. 359, 374 (1968); 43 Am.Jur.2d Insurance § 720 (1982); see Estrin Construction Co. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., 612 S.W.2d 413, 421 (Mo.Ct.App.1981). After the circuit court has developed on the record the necessary facts and considered each of the factors discusse......
-
Gibraltar Cas. Co. v. Sargent & Lundy, No. 1-89-1277
...require its insurer to defend it in any action. Plaintiff cites Estrin Construction Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. (Mo.App.1981), 612 S.W.2d 413, in which it was held that there was substantial evidence to find that a control exclusion was applicable to a general contractor who was cont......
Request a trial to view additional results
45 cases
-
US v. Conservation Chemical Co., No. 82-0983-CV-W-5.
...to property owned or occupied by an insured is excluded from coverage by CGL policies. Estrin Const. Co. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 612 S.W.2d 413 (Mo.App.1981), (distinguished liability coverage that relates to damage done by others and, for example, collision or builder's risk insurance wh......
-
Independent Petrochemical v. Aetna Cas. and Sur., Civ. A. No. 83-3347.
...which plaintiffs argue is the case here. Plaintiffs cite a Missouri Court of Appeals case, Estrin Const. Co., Inc. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur., 612 S.W.2d 413 (Mo.App.1981), as their sole support for this proposition. In Estrin, the court found that in adhesion contracts, the "printed words of a c......
-
National Mut. Ins. Co. v. McMahon & Sons, Inc., Nos. 17245
...Clause, 6 Hous.L.Rev. 359, 374 (1968); 43 Am.Jur.2d Insurance § 720 (1982); see Estrin Construction Co. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., 612 S.W.2d 413, 421 (Mo.Ct.App.1981). After the circuit court has developed on the record the necessary facts and considered each of the factors discusse......
-
Gibraltar Cas. Co. v. Sargent & Lundy, No. 1-89-1277
...require its insurer to defend it in any action. Plaintiff cites Estrin Construction Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. (Mo.App.1981), 612 S.W.2d 413, in which it was held that there was substantial evidence to find that a control exclusion was applicable to a general contractor who was cont......
Request a trial to view additional results