Estrin Const. Co., Inc. v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co., No. WD

CourtCourt of Appeal of Missouri (US)
Writing for the CourtSHANGLER
Citation612 S.W.2d 413
PartiesESTRIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. The AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, Respondent. 31323.
Docket NumberNo. WD
Decision Date02 February 1981
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
45 practice notes
  • US v. Conservation Chemical Co., No. 82-0983-CV-W-5.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 8th Circuit. Western District of Missouri
    • June 27, 1986
    ...to property owned or occupied by an insured is excluded from coverage by CGL policies. Estrin Const. Co. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 612 S.W.2d 413 (Mo.App.1981), (distinguished liability coverage that relates to damage done by others and, for example, collision or builder's risk insurance wh......
  • Independent Petrochemical v. Aetna Cas. and Sur., Civ. A. No. 83-3347.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • January 10, 1994
    ...which plaintiffs argue is the case here. Plaintiffs cite a Missouri Court of Appeals case, Estrin Const. Co., Inc. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur., 612 S.W.2d 413 (Mo.App.1981), as their sole support for this proposition. In Estrin, the court found that in adhesion contracts, the "printed words of a c......
  • National Mut. Ins. Co. v. McMahon & Sons, Inc., Nos. 17245
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of West Virginia
    • April 15, 1987
    ...Clause, 6 Hous.L.Rev. 359, 374 (1968); 43 Am.Jur.2d Insurance § 720 (1982); see Estrin Construction Co. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., 612 S.W.2d 413, 421 (Mo.Ct.App.1981). After the circuit court has developed on the record the necessary facts and considered each of the factors discusse......
  • Gibraltar Cas. Co. v. Sargent & Lundy, No. 1-89-1277
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • August 1, 1990
    ...require its insurer to defend it in any action. Plaintiff cites Estrin Construction Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. (Mo.App.1981), 612 S.W.2d 413, in which it was held that there was substantial evidence to find that a control exclusion was applicable to a general contractor who was cont......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
45 cases
  • US v. Conservation Chemical Co., No. 82-0983-CV-W-5.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 8th Circuit. Western District of Missouri
    • June 27, 1986
    ...to property owned or occupied by an insured is excluded from coverage by CGL policies. Estrin Const. Co. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 612 S.W.2d 413 (Mo.App.1981), (distinguished liability coverage that relates to damage done by others and, for example, collision or builder's risk insurance wh......
  • Independent Petrochemical v. Aetna Cas. and Sur., Civ. A. No. 83-3347.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • January 10, 1994
    ...which plaintiffs argue is the case here. Plaintiffs cite a Missouri Court of Appeals case, Estrin Const. Co., Inc. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur., 612 S.W.2d 413 (Mo.App.1981), as their sole support for this proposition. In Estrin, the court found that in adhesion contracts, the "printed words of a c......
  • National Mut. Ins. Co. v. McMahon & Sons, Inc., Nos. 17245
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of West Virginia
    • April 15, 1987
    ...Clause, 6 Hous.L.Rev. 359, 374 (1968); 43 Am.Jur.2d Insurance § 720 (1982); see Estrin Construction Co. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., 612 S.W.2d 413, 421 (Mo.Ct.App.1981). After the circuit court has developed on the record the necessary facts and considered each of the factors discusse......
  • Gibraltar Cas. Co. v. Sargent & Lundy, No. 1-89-1277
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • August 1, 1990
    ...require its insurer to defend it in any action. Plaintiff cites Estrin Construction Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. (Mo.App.1981), 612 S.W.2d 413, in which it was held that there was substantial evidence to find that a control exclusion was applicable to a general contractor who was cont......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT