Etheredge v. Wilson
Decision Date | 04 March 1930 |
Docket Number | No. 20227.,20227. |
Citation | 41 Ga.App. 432,153 S.E. 230 |
Parties | ETHEREDGE. v. WILSON. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Rehearing granted April 16, 1930.
Judgment Adhered to on Rehearing May 14, 1930.
The bona fide holder of a soldier's certificate under Michie's Code, § 1888, has the right to engage in the business of purchasing salaries and wages without paying a county or municipal license.
A partial assignment of wages, not assented to by the debtor, will not support an action brought by the assignee against the assignor for a conversion of the wages assigned.
The partial assignment of wages in this case did not put such title to the wages assigned in the assignee as will support the action for conversion brought against the assignor by the assignee, and the judge of the superior court erred in refusing to sanction the assignor's certiorari from the municipal court of Macon.
Error from Superior Court, Bibb County; Malcolm D. Jones, Judge.
Action by E. P. Wilson against L. C. Etheredge. Judgment for plaintiff, defendant's certiorari was overruled, and defendant brings error.
Reversed.
E. P. Goodrum, of Macon, and J. L. R. Boyd, of Atlanta, for plaintiff in error.
Luther U. Bioodworth, Miller & Lowrey, and E. W. Maynard, all of Macon, and R. R. Jackson and C. E. Moore, both of Atlanta, for defendant in error.
E. P. Wilson brought his action In the municipal court of Macon against L. C. Etheredge, alleging that the defendant had assigned to him $27.50 due defendant by the Central of Georgia Railway Company for wages or salary already earned by him in the employ of that company; that by virtue of said assignment the title to the money was in plaintiff; that defendant collected said sum from his employer and converted it to his own use by refusing to deliver it to plaintiff; and that defendant was liable to plaintiff in the sum of $27.50 because of said conversion. Defendant's demurrers were overruled, and the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff. The exception here is to the refusal of the judge of the superior court to sanction defendant's certiorari.
The demurrer raised the point that the petition set out no cause of action at law, because the action is predicated upon a partial assignment of wages, which conveyed no title to the money to plaintiff, and that jurisdiction of the case was in the superior court of Bibb county, and not in the municipal court of Macon.
The material part of the assignment is as follows:
We do not think that the demurrer under consideration is good, for the reason that it does not appear from the pleadings and the copy of the assignment attached thereto that the paper is a partial assignment.
When this paper was offered in evidence it was objected to (1) because it was a partial assignment and never conveyed title to the $27.50, and (2) "because the body of the original assignment was in blank as to the amount alleged sold, and was too indefinite to be material as evidence."
The assignment speaks for itself, and was, we think, properly admitted in evidence over the objections interposed.
After the evidence had closed, defendant moved "to exclude the assignment * * * because it appears that the plaintiff was not a licensed and bonded buyer of salary and wages." It appearing, from the evidence, that E. P. Wilson, trading as Acme Investment Company, had a "veteran's or soldier's license from the ordinary of Bibb county, " the question is whether he was exempted from paying the license and giving bond.
The act of the General Assembly on this subject, as amended in 1919 (Ga. Laws 1919, p. 90, Michie's Code [1926], § 1888), reads as follows:
"Any disabled or indigent Confederate soldier or soldiers of the Seminole, Creek, or Cherokee Indian War, *...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hubbard v. Bibb Brokerage Co
...to the assignee, or for a tortious conversion by the assignor of the assignee's property. The decision in the case of Etheredge v. Wilson, 41 Ga. App. 432, 153 S. E. 230, which was by. only a majority of the court, and is inconsistent with the Georgia statute of uses, and decisions of the S......
-
Hubbard v. Bibb Brokerage Co.
...not binding on that court as authority where it was not rendered by an unanimous bench. As we do not concur in the ruling announced in Etheredge v. Wilson, we must, with deference and respect to the opinion of our learned brothers who participated in that decision, decline to follow it. The......
- Graham v. Southern Ry. Co
-
Graham v. Southern Ry. Co.
...debtor. Besides, the decision in Shearer v. Shearer was not by a full bench. Counsel likewise rely upon the decision in Etheredge v. Wilson, 41 Ga.App. 432, 153 S.E. 230. In that case the proceeding was one at law against assignor for a wrongful conversion of funds under a partial assignmen......