Eureka Producing Co. v. Colquitt
Decision Date | 18 July 1931 |
Docket Number | No. 12533.,12533. |
Citation | 45 S.W.2d 254 |
Parties | EUREKA PRODUCING CO. et al. v. COLQUITT et al.<SMALL><SUP>*</SUP></SMALL> |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Young County; Allan D. Montgomery, Judge.
Action by O. B. Colquitt and J. N. Graves against the Eureka Producing Company and others. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.
Reversed and rendered.
Fred T. Arnold, of Graham, C. E. Cooper, of Tulsa, Okl., and Geo. L. Kelly, of Wichita Falls, for appellants.
Marshall & King, of Graham, and W. B. Hamilton and Marshall Newcomb, both of Dallas, for appellees.
The Eureka Producing Company, the Turman Oil Company, and Joseph Glass and N. T. Gilbert, receivers for those two companies, have appealed from a judgment rendered against them in favor of O. B. Colquitt for the sum of $808, and J. N. Graves for $269.34, as royalties for gas taken by appellants from a certain oil and gas lease, which was a part of a larger lease originally acquired from the state by O. B. Colquitt and his associates, C. F. Colcord and J. N. Graves, on certain river bed lands situated in Young county. Appellants claimed the gas under certain assignments of a portion of that original lease, hereinafter termed the "lease in controversy," by Colquitt and his associates, and the controlling question presented on this appeal is whether those assignments conveyed the gas as well as oil which might be developed from the lease; or whether, as a consideration for those assignments, the appellants became bound to account to the assignors for a royalty of two-eighths of all the gas produced from the lease. On April 12, 1921, Colcord, Graves, and Colquitt, as parties of the first part, entered into a contract in writing with James R. Armstrong, as party of the second part, by the terms of which parties of the first part agreed to execute an assignment to Armstrong of a good and merchantable title to the lease in controversy, and in consideration of that contract, Armstrong agreed
Two days later and on April 14, 1921, Colcord, Graves, and Colquitt executed to Armstrong an assignment of the lease as they had agreed to do in the written contract. That assignment, after reciting that the assignors had acquired from the state, under permit, title to the lease, contained this provision: "Now, therefore, for and in consideration of One Dollar (and other good and valuable considerations), the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned, the present owners of the said lease and all rights thereunder or incident thereto, do hereby bargain, sell, transfer, assign and convey all rights, title and interest of the original lessee and present owners in and to said lease and rights thereunder in so far as it covers the area and portion of said oil and gas permit as above set forth and described, together with all personal property used or obtained in connection therewith, to James R. Armstrong and his heirs, successors and assigns."
On August 2, 1921, James R. Armstrong executed to the Eureka Producing Company an assignment of the same lease, reading in part as follows: "Know all men by these presents: That I, Jas. R. Armstrong, of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten ($10.00) Dollars, cash in hand paid by Eureka Producing Company, a corporation, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and of other good and valuable consideration, have sold, transferred, conveyed and assigned, and by these presents, do sell, transfer, convey and assign unto the said Eureka Producing Company, all and singular, my oil and gas lease and leasehold estate, right, title and interest in and to the following described tract of land, situated in Young County, State of Texas, which is an undivided five-eighths (5/8ths) interest therein, which said land is more particularly described as follows: * * *"
Then follows a description of the land, with recital of the acquisition from the state by Colquitt and his associates, and with the further recital that "on or about April 21st [12th?], 1921, the said J. N. Graves, O. B. Colquitt and C. F. Colcord assigned said oil and gas lease to James R. Armstrong, reserving a two-eighths (2/8ths) interest therein. * * *"
During the spring and early summer of the year 1921, the Eureka Producing Company drilled three wells on the lease, which did not produce any gas but produced oil, and Colquitt and his associates received oil royalties from those wells in accordance with the terms of the contract. During the year 1927, a deeper oil sand, known as the Panhandle sand, was discovered on the adjoining lease in a well producing more than 500 barrels of oil a day, and after its discovery Colquitt threatened a forfeiture of the lease held by the Eureka Producing Company unless it drilled a well to that sand. Thereupon, negotiations between the parties followed, as a result of which another contract in writing, of date August 6, 1927, was entered into by and between Colquitt and J. N. Graves as parties of the first part (Colquitt having theretofore acquired the interest of Colcord), and the Eureka Producing Company as party of the second part, reading as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
MERCHANTS NAT. B. & T. CO. v. Professional Men's Ass'n, Inc.
...rule is a rule of substantive law. Shropshire v. Alvarado St. Bank, 196 S.W. 977; Morrison Co. v. Riley, 198 S.W. 1031; Eureka Producing Co. v. Colquitt, 45 S.W.2d 254.) We hold the parol or extrinsic evidence rule is a rule of substantive law, and we must apply it in accordance with the ap......