Evans v. J. Stiles, Inc.
| Decision Date | 27 March 1985 |
| Docket Number | No. C-3733,C-3733 |
| Citation | 689 S.W.2d 399 |
| Parties | Jack EVANS et ux., Petitioner, v. J. STILES, INC., Respondent. |
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Strasburger & Price, Royal H. Brin, Jr., Boyd Waggoner, Dallas, for petitioner.
Wesner, Coke, Boyd & Clymer, C. Thomas Wesner, Jr., Dallas, for respondent.
ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ERROR
Jack and Mary Kay Evans bought a new home from J. Stiles, Inc. The Evanses sued Stiles for breach of implied warranties and to recover for damages arising from the use of faulty brick on the home. The charge to the jury included two special issues on implied warranties. In response to Special Issue No. 1, the jury found that the house was not constructed in a good workmanlike manner. In response to Special Issue No. 3, the jury refused to find that the house was "not suitable for human habitation." The trial court rendered judgment for the Evanses. Holding that there could be no breach of implied warranty absent a finding of uninhabitability, the court of appeals 1 reversed the judgment of the trial court and rendered a take-nothing judgment against the Evanses. 683 S.W.2d 481. We reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and affirm that of the trial court.
In Humber v. Morton, 426 S.W.2d 554 (Tex.1968), this Court held that a builder/vendor impliedly warrants that a building constructed for residential use is constructed in a good workmanlike manner and is suitable for human habitation. Gupta v. Ritter Homes, Inc., 646 S.W.2d 168, 169 (Tex.1983); G-W-L, Inc. v. Robichaux, 643 S.W.2d 392, 393 (Tex.1982). The court of appeals held, as a matter of law, that Stiles had not breached the Humber implied warranty because the jury refused to find uninhabitability. In effect, the court of appeals held that there can be a breach of the Humber implied warranty only if a house is found to be uninhabitable. Thereby, the court of appeals rendered meaningless the language in Humber referring to construction in a "good workmanlike manner."
In Humber, Gupta and Robichaux, this Court plainly stated that the builder/vendor warrants both workmanship "and" habitability. If we had intended that the warranty extend only to habitability, we would not have used the word "and." Moreover, as support for our position in Humber, this Court cited with approval the following language from Moore v. Werner, 418 S.W.2d 918 (Tex.Civ.App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1967, no writ):
It was the seller's duty to perform...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Melody Home Mfg. Co. v. Barnes
...for residential use has been constructed in a good and workmanlike manner and is suitable for human habitation. Evans v. J. Stiles, Inc., 689 S.W.2d 399, 400 (Tex.1985). When the Barneses discovered the defect in their home, they had the option to immediately sue for money damages or give M......
-
Centex Homes v. Buecher
...In Texas, however, the two warranties provide separate and distinct protection for the new home buyer. See Evans v. J. Stiles, Inc., 689 S.W.2d 399, 400 (Tex.1985) (possible to breach warranty of good workmanship without breaching warranty of habitability); accord Chandler v. Madsen, 197 Mo......
-
Luker v. Arnold
...for residential use is constructed in a good and workmanlike manner and is suitable for human habitation. Evans v. J. Stiles, Inc., 689 S.W.2d 399, 400 (Tex.1985) (per curiam) (citing Humber, 426 S.W.2d at 555)); see also Gupta v. Ritter Homes, Inc., 646 S.W.2d 168, 169 (Tex.1983) (holding ......
-
Miller v. Spencer
...sale of a house: (1) warranty of habitability; and (2) warranty of construction in a good and workmanlike manner. Evans v. J. Stiles, Inc., 689 S.W.2d 399, 400 (Tex.1985); Humber v. Morton, 426 S.W.2d 554, 555 (Tex.1968). The warranty of habitability requires that a house be safe, sanitary ......
-
Table of Cases
...Essex Crane Rental Corp. v. Kitzman, 723 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1986, no writ), §7.19 Evans v. J. Stiles, Inc. , 689 S.W.2d 399 (Tex. 1985), §1.02.9.2.1 A-6 DTPA FORMS AND PRACTICE GUIDE Evans v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. , 685 S.W.2d 765 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist......
-
Initial Client Contacts (Plaintiff)
...house was constructed in a good and workmanlike manner, and (2) was suitable for human habitation. See also Evans v. J. Stiles, Inc. , 689 S.W.2d 399 (Tex. 1985). The Humber warranties implied into the sale of new homes were superseded by the Residential Construction Commission Act between ......