Evans v. Marshall, A01A2113.
| Decision Date | 24 January 2002 |
| Docket Number | No. A01A2113.,A01A2113. |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
| Parties | EVANS et al. v. MARSHALL. |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Ronald S. Iddins, Columbus, for appellants.
Richard E. Flowers, Columbus, for appellee.
On June 24, 1996, Fred D. Marshall, Jr. d/b/a Parade of Homes sued his tenants, Joseph C. Evans and Erin K. Evans, to recover an unspecified sum for damages to the leased premises. The Evanses filed a timely answer. On January 18, 2001, Marshall filed an amendment to the complaint, seeking additional damages unknown to him at the time of the filing of the original suit. The Evanses did not respond to the amended complaint. On February 28, 2001, Marshall moved for the entry of default and a hearing on the issue of damages. On the same day, the trial court granted the motion, entered a default, and scheduled the matter for a trial on damages. That trial was held the next day, and it resulted in a judgment in the amount of $6,074.43. We granted the Evanses' application for discretionary appeal.
The trial court erred in ruling that the Evanses were in default for failure to file responsive pleadings. A defendant is not required to answer an amended complaint unless ordered to do so by the trial court. OCGA § 9-11-15(a); Random Access v. Atlanta Datacom, 232 Ga.App. 269, 270, 501 S.E.2d 610 (1998); Chan v. W-East Trading Corp., 199 Ga.App. 76, 79(5), 403 S.E.2d 840 (1991). The Evanses were not in default, and the trial court erred by holding a trial on the issue of damages. The default order dated February 28, 2001, and the final judgment must be reversed.
Judgment reversed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Water's Edge Plantation Homeowner's Ass'n, Inc. v. Reliford
...n. 23, 681 S.E.2d 168 (2009). See OCGA § 9–11–8(d); Shields v. Gish, 280 Ga. 556, 557(1), 629 S.E.2d 244 (2006); Evans v. Marshall, 253 Ga.App. 439, 559 S.E.2d 165 (2002). Thus, allegations contained for the first time in an amended complaint are not deemed admitted even when a defendant is......
-
Chugh Shopping Ctr., Inc. v. Ameris Bank
...at 308(1), 601 S.E.2d 701. 6.Id. at 309(1), 601 S.E.2d 701 (emphasis supplied). 7.Id. 8. See id.; see generally Evans v. Marshall, 253 Ga.App. 439, 559 S.E.2d 165 (2002) (explaining that a trial court errs in finding defendant in default, where answer was not due). 9. See City of Atlanta v.......
- Petersen v. Tyson, A01A2042.
-
Wilcher v. Way Acceptance Co.
...is not required to answer an amended complaint unless ordered to do so by the trial court.” (Citations omitted.) Evans v. Marshall, 253 Ga.App. 439, 559 S.E.2d 165 (2002). 4. Wilcher also asserts error with regard to the trial court's failure to rule on certain motions. But this claim of er......