Evans v. State

Decision Date06 May 1971
Docket NumberNo. 26457,26457
Citation227 Ga. 571,181 S.E.2d 845
PartiesWillie James EVANS v. The STATE.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Frank K. Martin, Columbus, for appellant.

E. Mullins Whisnant, Dist. Atty., Eugene Hardwick Polleys, Jr., Columbus, Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., Courtney Wilder Stanton, Dorothy T. Beasley, Asst. Attys. Gen., Atlanta, for appellee.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court

UNDERCOFLER, Justice.

This appeal is from the conviction of Willie James Evans for the murder of his wife, Willie Louise Evans. He appeals to this court from the sentence of life imprisonment. Held:

The evidence shows that the defendant and the decedent had been married about nine months, that they lived in an apartment with his wife's three children and two grandchildren.

Mary Hudson testified that she was a neighbor of the decedent and on the morning of the homicide, Saturday, March 28, 1970, they went shopping. They saw the defendant's car stopped with the hood raised. The decedent went over to the car and talked with the defendant. She returned to the witness' car. As they were driving, the defendant passed them in his car at least three times traveling at a high rate of speed. She and the decedent returned to their apartment house, and the defendant drove up in his car. The decedent went over to the defendant's car and he seemed very angry. Later the witness went to the apartment of the defendant and the decedent to talk to the defendant but he would not talk with her. She left their apartment about 1:15 p.m. that afternoon. About 3:15 p.m. she saw the decedent again outside her apartment. About 4:50 p.m. the nine-year-old son of the decedent came to her apartment and told her that his mother was dead. She went to the decedent's apartment, found her dead and the police were called. The decedent was lying on her back on the side of the bed, was undressed from the waist up, and had no shoes on. She found one of the decedent's teeth in the living room. The one-year-old and three-year-old grandchildren were in the room crying and yelling.

Kenneth Word, the nine-year-old son of the decedent testified that on the day of the homicide, he had been outside the apartment in the yard playing; that he came inside to get some water; that his mother was lying on the sofa watching television; that the defendant was sitting in a chair in the living room looking at his mother; that the two small children were in the house; that he left the house by the front door which was unlocked; that he later tried to enter the house by the front door, found it locked and had to enter by the back door; and that, when he went inside, he found his mother dead.

The nextdoor neighbor of the decedent about 11 or 12 o'clock that morning heard some 'bumping and moving around' and she heard 'somebody arguing.'

Cary Evans, the sister of the defendant, testified that he came to Phenix City on the day of the homicide. She asked to borrow his car to go shopping about 2 p.m. He lent her his car and she brought him to within 1 1/2 blocks of his home.

Rev. Bobby Lee Upshaw and his wife drove to the home of the decedent to deliver a case of soft drinks. About 4:30 p.m. he knocked on the door of their apartment. He waited about 5 minutes before the defendant came to the door and told him that the decedent had gone to town with the children. He saw one of the decedent's small grandchildren in the room screaming. The defendant said the child was screaming because her mother had gone downtown. As they drove away from the apartment, he saw the defendant leave the apartment and walk toward the decedent's car and the clothesline. Flora Upshaw testified that she was with her husband when he went to the decedent's apartment to deliver the drinks. She asked her husband what time it was and he said 4:30 p.m. Her husband went to the apartment door and knocked. He had to wait a long time before the door was opened. She saw her husband talk to the defendant. The defendant took the soft drinks and 'threw' them on the table. After they drove away, the defendant walked to his car.

Dr. Richard Shuffstall, a pathologist, testified that he performed a post-mortem examination on the body of the decedent about 8 p.m. on the day of the homicide. His examination revealed that one upper front tooth was missing, that another upper tooth was very loose, that a constriction mark was along the front of the anterior surface of the neck with some skin loss, that it had the appearance of skin affected by a rope, that there were small hemorrhages in the whites of her eyes and on her scalp; and that both of her lungs were filled with fluid. These are classical findings that are noticed when death is the result of strangulation or suffocation. He testified that death had occurred within six hours of his examination.

Detective Norwood testified that he first saw the defendant on the night of the homicide about 6:45 p.m. About 8:30 or 9 the evening he began to suspect him of murder because of the evidence given by the witnesses they had questioned and because of the findings from the autopsy. The defendant was informed of his constitutional rights and stated that he did not need an attorney because he had not done anything, that he wanted to find out 'about all of this,' and that he had been in Phenix City since noon of that day. The detective observed numerous fresh scratch marks on the back of the defendant's left hand and one scratch was deep and oozing blood. He had a photograph made of the left hand at that time.

Frankie Lee Word Bradley, the decedent's daughter, testified that she lived in the apartment with her mother, the defendant, her sister, her brother, and her sister's two children. About a month prior to the homicide, the decedent and the defendant were arguing in another room. She heard some fighting and went into the room. She saw the defendant hit the decedent. She asked him to stop hitting her mother. He told her he would hit her again. He then struck the witness and she scratched him. He left the apartment and later came back with a shotgun and pointed it at her mother. He and the decedent struggled over the gun. Her sister attempted to call the police and the defendant snatched the telephone from the wall. They went to another apartment to call the police and the defendant left. They went to her sister's apartment then because the decedent was afraid to stay at their home. While they were at her sister's apartment, someone shot through the window and hit her brother-in-law but she did not see who fired the shot. A few minutes later, she saw the defendant walking back and forth with a gun in front of her sister's apartment. He told the decedent he was going to kill her if it was the last thing he did.

Cora Battle testified that the decedent was her mother and that she was living with her mother, the defendant, her sister, her brother and her two children at the time of the homicide. About 10 or 11 o'clock a.m. on the day of the homicide, her stepfather was angry with her mother because she had not cooked him anything to eat. The witness left the apartment about 3 p.m. and her mother was lying in the living room watching television and the defendant was lying on the bed in the bedroom. She returned home that day about 5:30 p.m. and saw the defendant, his sister, and his niece leaving the apartment area. She gave substantially the same testimony about the altercation between her mother and the defendant that her sister had given. She further testified about the subsequent shooting and threat of the defendant that he would kill the decedent if it was the last thing he ever did.

George Wiley testified that he saw the defendant at his Eighth Street bar between 3 and 4 p.m. and as late as 4:15 p.m. when he left to go home. On cross examination he was read a statement signed by him on May 11, 1970 to the effect that the defendant was in the bar at 4:30 p.m. and that the witness left a 5:15 p.m. Eula Mintz testified that the defendant was in the bar a little after 4 p.m. Willie O. Brown testified that he saw the defendant at the bar sometime after 2 or 3 p.m. Arthur Jordan testified that the defendant was in the bar at 4 p.m. or 4:15 p.m., that he took the defendant to Phenix City and back to the bar, and then took him to his apartment.

The defendant testified that he had injured his hand on the morning of the homicide when he tried to repair the radiator hose on his car. His hand slipped and the engine of the car burned it. His stepdaughter, Cora, had planned to leave the apartment that day about 3:30 p.m. Two or three minutes after she left, Upshaw came to the back door and the child was crying because its mother had just gone to town. He told Upshaw that his wife was in the house. He then walked to the clothesline,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 cases
  • Dawson v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • May 4, 1983
    ...of a previous difficulty between a defendant and victim which illustrates the state of feeling between them. Evans v. State, 227 Ga. 571 [ (4) ], 181 S.E.2d 845 (1971)." White v. State, 242 Ga. 21, 22(4), 247 S.E.2d 759 (1978); see also Milton v. State, 245 Ga. 20, 262 S.E.2d 789 (1980). Th......
  • Milton v. State, 35477
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • January 4, 1980
    ...difficulties between the deceased and the accused may be introduced Against the defendant to illustrate his motive. Evans v. State, 227 Ga. 571, 577, 181 S.E.2d 845 (1971); White v. State, 242 Ga. 21, 22(4), 247 S.E.2d 759 (1978); Boling v. State, 244 Ga. 825, 262 S.E.2d 123 (1979). Since s......
  • Nolley v. Caldwell
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • September 8, 1972
    ...this court exemplified by Thornton v. State, 226 Ga. 837, 178 S.E.2d 193; Lee v. Smith, 227 Ga. 503, 181 S.E.2d 364 and Evans v. State, 227 Ga. 571, 576, 181 S.E.2d 845, the instructions to the jury on the prisoner's trial relating to alibi shows no 8. The enumeration of error complaining o......
  • Boling v. State, 35523
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • December 5, 1979
    ...of feelings between the accused and the deceased and showing motive. White v. State, 242 Ga. 21, 247 S.E.2d 759 (1978); Evans v. State, 227 Ga. 571, 181 S.E.2d 845 (1971). Evidence which is otherwise admissible is not rendered inadmissible because it incidentally places the defendant's char......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT