Evans v. State, 92-1431

Citation608 So.2d 90
Decision Date23 October 1992
Docket NumberNo. 92-1431,92-1431
Parties17 Fla. L. Week. D2452 Greg Edward EVANS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtCourt of Appeal of Florida (US)

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Charlie McCoy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Greg Edward Evans, appellant, seeks review of two conditions of community control and probation imposed by the trial court, after revocation of the probation he was serving for the offense of attempted sexual battery. Appellant contends the trial court erred in ordering him to work full-time and to earn at least $800 per month, and in delegating the requirement that appellant obtain psychological evaluation and treatment to the community control/probation officer. We reverse.

A condition of probation must be reasonable, and must be "rationally related to the nature of the crime and aimed at encouraging the defendant's rehabilitation." Larson v. State, 572 So.2d 1368, 1370-71 (Fla.1991); Smith v. State, 513 So.2d 1367, 1368 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). Moreover, a contemporaneous objection is not a prerequisite to appeal an illegal condition of probation, or a condition of probation that "is so egregious as to be the equivalent of fundamental error." Larson, 572 So.2d at 1370-71.

A condition of probation requiring the probationer to maintain full-time employment has been found to be sufficiently egregious as to constitute fundamental error. Walls v. State, 596 So.2d 811, 812 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Since such factors as a down-turn in the economy could prevent the completion of such a condition of probation, a more appropriate course would be to order the probationer to seek gainful employment. Boudreaux v. State, 578 So.2d 457, 458 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Cowan v. State, 527 So.2d 305 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Walls, 596 So.2d at 812.

In a similar vein, it is a settled principle that a trial court may not delegate judicial duties to a probation officer. Larson, 572 So.2d at 1371; Singleton v. State, 582 So.2d 657, 658 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). However, it is proper for a trial court to delegate authority to exercise incidental discretion, such as supervision of counseling for a probationer, provided the exercise of discretion is used for rehabilitative purposes. Larson, 572 So.2d at 1371; Singleton, 582 So.2d at 658.

Application of the foregoing legal principles to the instant case leads to the conclusion that the condition of probation and community control requiring appellant to maintain full-time employment, and to earn at...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Armstrong v. State, 92-1893
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 2, 1993
    ...to be the equivalent of fundamental error and, thus, appellant was not required to make a contemporaneous objection. Evans v. State, 608 So.2d 90 (Fla.1st DCA 1992); Walls v. State, 596 So.2d 811 (Fla.4th DCA 1992). Because economic conditions beyond a defendant's control could prevent the ......
  • Brown v. State, s. 94-2032
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 5, 1996
    ...beyond a defendant's control could prevent the defendant from completing such a condition...." Id. at 1121 (citing Evans v. State, 608 So.2d 90, 91 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Walls v. State, 596 So.2d 811, 812 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)). The court recognized that the Evans and Walls courts modified thi......
  • Reed v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • February 13, 2004
    ...control could prevent completion of this requirement. See White v. State, 619 So.2d 429, 431 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Evans v. State, 608 So.2d 90, 91 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Walls v. State, 596 So.2d 811, 812 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).1 A trial court may not revoke probation for violation of a conditio......
  • Aviles v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 8, 2015
    ...2d DCA 2004). A probationer can be ordered to either maintain full-time employment or provide proof of job searches. Evans v. State, 608 So.2d 90 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) ; Miller. But without providing an unemployed probationer the reasonable opportunity to secure employment, the trial court cr......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT