Evans v. Tarrant County Child Welfare Unit, 17882
| Decision Date | 15 April 1977 |
| Docket Number | No. 17882,17882 |
| Parties | Beverly EVANS v. TARRANT COUNTY CHILD WELFARE UNIT. |
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Tarrant County Child Welfare Unit (Welfare) filed suit on January 5, 1976, to terminate parental rights between Beverly A. Evans (mother) and Jerry A. Stetler (father) and their five minor children and, in the alternative, for managing conservatorship. An emergency order of trial court appointed Welfare the temporary managing conservator (T/M/C) of all five children and immediate protective custody of same. After trial, the judge (no jury involved) denied termination and ordered Welfare appointed T/M/C of all the children. The oldest girl, Jerianna, has since gone to live with father.
Mother appealed the judgment claiming the trial court erred as a matter of law in not returning custody to her after refusing to terminate her parental rights under Tex.Family Code Ann. §§ 15.05(c)(1) and (2) (1975). She also claims there was no evidence and insufficient evidence for the trial court to find that the best interests of the children would be served by appointing Welfare T/M/C. Also, mother claims Welfare's appointment to be against the great weight and preponderance of the believable evidence and that trial court abused its discretion in not returning the children to her custody.
We overrule all of mother's five points of error and affirm the judgment.
The part of the statement of facts relied upon by Welfare to justify its appointment as T/M/C reflects:
Mother's present husband, James Evans, pled guilty to a felony charge of indecent exposure to Jerianna, age 15 years, and received an eight-year probated sentence;
Evans has a drinking problem (which he claims has abated since Dec. 1975);
Evans drew a firearm on mother;
Evans struck mother in front of her children;
Evans and mother are still living together and propose to take custody of the four younger children.
We find these facts sufficient to support the judgment of the trial court, particularly as we must examine these facts in the light most consistent with the findings of the trial court.
We find the refusal to terminate not to be a dismissal of the case, as contended by mother, particularly in view of the alternate pleading of Welfare. We find the trial court did not abuse its discretion in appointing Welfare T/M/C of the children. Tex.Family Code Ann. § 15.05(c). Also, "The technical rules of civil procedure cannot apply with equal force in a child custody case as in...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re K.D.
...or (2) render any order in the best interest of the child.” Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 161.205 (West 2014); see also Evans v. Tarrant Cnty. Child Welfare Unit, 550 S.W.2d 144, 145 (Tex.Civ.App.–Fort Worth 1977, no writ) (holding that trial court did not err in refusing to dismiss Department's pe......
-
Snider v. Grey
...104 (1981); remarriage of a parent, along with other accompanying facts affecting the welfare of the child, see Evans v. Tarrant County Child Welfare Unit, 550 S.W.2d 144 (Tex.Civ.App.--Fort Worth 1977, no writ); Dohrmann v. Chandler, 435 S.W.2d 232 (Tex.Civ.App.--Corpus Christi 1968, no wr......
-
In the Interest of C.Q.T.M.
...T.A.B., 598 S.W.2d at 939-40; Colbert v. Stokes, 581 S.W.2d 770, 771-72 (Tex. Civ. App.--Austin 1979, no writ); Evans v. Tarrant County Child Welfare Unit, 550 S.W.2d 144, 145-46 (Tex. Civ. App.--Fort Worth 1977, no writ). Such evidence can be relevant to the issues of whether awarding sole......
-
In re B.O.
...of this holding, the Austin court cited In re J.D.H., 661 S.W.2d 744, 748 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 1983, no writ), and Evans v. Tarrant Cty. Child Welfare Unit, 550 S.W.2d 144, 145 (Tex. Civ. App.—Fort Worth 1977, no writ). In Evans, we quoted the following to support our determination that the ......