Everett v. Everett

Decision Date17 March 1919
Docket Number20544
Citation81 So. 417,119 Miss. 627
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
PartiesEVERETT v. EVERETT

March, 1919

Division A

DIVORCE. Motion for allowance of attorney fees. Time for contesting.

Where on appeal in a divorce case the wife made a motion in the supreme court for the allowance of an attorney fee in a certain amount which was not resisted, it was too late to contest such allowance after the motion for such allowance had been passed on by the court.

HON. JOE MAY, Chancellor.

APPEAL from the chancery court of Coahoma county, HON. JOE MAY, Chancellor.

On motion to correct allowance of attorney fees. For former opinion see 80 So. 647.

The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.

Motion overruled.

Cutrer & Johnston, for appellant.

Green & Green and Maynard & Fitz Gerald, for appellee.

OPINION

SMITH, C. J.

This is a proceeding for a divorce in which the wife is the appellant and the husband the appellee; and in which the appellant, by motion duly served on counsel for the appellee, prayed for the allowance of an attorney's fee in this court in the sum of two hundred and fifty dollars. When the motion came on to be heard, it was not resisted, and consequently was sustained as a matter of course. Counsel for the appellee now suggest that the fee is excessive and that we erred in not allowing it for a smaller sum.

We committed no error in allowing the attorney's fee as prayed for in the appellant's motion, for the reason that no objection was interposed thereto, in the absence of which we, of course, presumed that the fee asked for was satisfactory to the appellee. The time to have contested the allowance was when we passed on the motion. It is too late now.

Overruled.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Walters v. Walters
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • December 6, 1937
    ... ... for services of solicitors in this court in this class of ... Hall v ... Hall, 27 So. 636, 77 Miss. 741; Everett v. Everett, ... 81 So. 417, 119 Miss. 627; Brown v. Brown, 85 So ... 180, 123 Miss. 125; Watts v. Smylie, 116 Miss. 12, ... 76 So. 684; Boyett v ... ...
  • Rees v. Rees
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • March 25, 1940
    ... ... Solicitor's ... fees should be allowed in this court ... Hall v ... Hall, 27 So. 636, 77 Miss. 741; Everett v. Everett, ... 81 So. 417, 119 Miss. 627; Brown v. Brown, 85 So. 180, 123 ... Miss. 125 ... The ... rule, though not invariable, of ... ...
  • Hopper v. Hopper
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • October 10, 1938
    ... ... incident to the power of the Supreme Court ... Hall v ... Hall, 27 So. 636; Everett v. Everett, 80 So. 647, 81 ... So. 417; 19 C. J., page 209, sec. 507, and page 281, sec. 643 ... We ... respectfully submit that this ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT