Evett v. City of Inverness
| Decision Date | 25 February 1970 |
| Docket Number | No. 38885,38885 |
| Citation | 232 So.2d 18 |
| Parties | Ida Lee EVETT, Petitioner, v. CITY OF INVERNESS, a municipal corporation, Respondent. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Writ of Certiorari to District Court of Appeal, Second District, 224 So.2d 365.
Ray Graham, Sarasota, for petitioner.
Lucuis M. Dyal, Jr., of Shackelford, Farrior, Stallings & Evans, Tampa, for respondent.
Wm. Reece Smith, Jr., and Daniel R. Walbolt, Tampa, amici curiae.
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued. Therefore, the writ is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Coleman v. Cooper
...149 Ind.App. 387, 272 N.E.2d 871 (1971); Evett v. City of Inverness, 224 So.2d 365 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1969), cert. dismissed, 232 So.2d 18 (Fla.1970); Keane v. City of Chicago, 98 Ill.App.2d 460, 240 N.E.2d 321 (1968). As the duty is to the general public rather than to a specific individual,......
-
Florida First Nat. Bank of Jacksonville v. City of Jacksonville
...861).15 Fla.App.3rd 1961, 132 So.2d 764, cert. dis. Sup.Ct.Fla.1962, 141 So.2d 737.16 Fla.App.2d 1969, 224 So.2d 365, cert. dis. Sup.Ct.Fla.1970, 232 So.2d 18.17 A virtually identical situation existed in City of Tampa v. Davis, Fla.App.2d 1969, 226 So.2d 450, which is distinguished on the ......