Ewald v. Ewald

Decision Date23 October 1914
Citation219 Mass. 111,106 N.E. 567
PartiesEWALD v. EWALD.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court

Oct. 23, 1914.

COUNSEL

Loring, Coolidge & Noble, of Boston (John Noble, Jr., of Boston, of counsel), for petitioner.

OPINION

SHELDON, J.

We do not find it necessary to determine whether there was a valid marriage between these parties. The petitioner rests her case upon the allegation that she acted with the deliberate intention of evading the laws of this commonwealth, in which she was and has continued to be resident. She not only comes into court with unclean hands, but she makes her wrongful conduct the very ground of her application for relief from its consequences. The court will leave her in the position in which she has chosen to place herself.

It is true that there has been some contrariety of decision as to this question in different courts; but we prefer to follow the rule laid down in a somewhat similar case in New Jersey and by the Supreme Court of New York in a case upon all fours with this. Rooney v. Rooney, 54 N. J. Eq. 231, 34 A. 682; Kerrison v. Kerrison, 60 How. Prac. (N. Y.) 51. The question was fully examined in the former of these two cases, with a sufficient citation of authorities; and we are content to rest upon that decision.

The order dismissing the petition must be affirmed.

So ordered.

To continue reading

Request your trial
26 cases
  • Coe v. Coe
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • October 30, 1946
    ...relied upon by Mr. Coe are not in point. Mrs. Coe does not, as did the petitioner for an annulment of marriage in Ewald v. Ewald, 219 Mass. 111, 106 N.E. 567, make her wrongful conduct the very ground of an application for relief from its consequences. See O'Gasapian v. Danielson, 284 Mass.......
  • Smith v. Smith
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • February 25, 1955
    ...of the case was right 'on its facts,' because the plaintiff was not entitled to relief grounded upon her own misconduct, Ewald v. Ewald, 219 Mass. 111, 106 N.E. 567, 'the implication, if any * * * to the effect that what is now G.L. (Ter.Ed.) c. 207, § 6, did not apply to marriages entered ......
  • Poor v. Poor
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • August 28, 1980
    ...v. Belcher, 324 Mass. 757, 88 N.E.2d 344 (1949). Korostynski v. Korostynski, 328 Mass. 6, 101 N.E.2d 356 (1951). Ewald v. Ewald, 219 Mass. 111, 106 N.E.2d 567 (1914). In each of these cases, the party seeking to avoid the marriage knowingly participated in the ceremony with full awareness o......
  • Chapman v. Chapman
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • June 22, 1916
    ...Hiram. This principle is closely analogous to that applied in Re Brigham, Petitioner, 176 Mass. 223, 57 N. E. 328, and Ewald v. Ewald, 219 Mass. 111, 106 N. E. 567. This result is supported by decisions in many other jurisdictions, though the grounds upon which they are put are not identica......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT