Ewing v. Pugh
Decision Date | 02 October 1967 |
Docket Number | No. 24738,24738 |
Citation | 420 S.W.2d 14 |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Parties | Ernest EWING, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Avis PUGH, Defendant-Appellant. |
Heilbron & Powell, by Sylvester Powell, Jr., Kansas City, for appellant.
Sheridan, Sanders, Millin, Peters, Carr & Sharp, by Robert E. Sharp, Kansas City, for respondent.
MAUGHMER, Commissioner.
This is a suit for property damage to plaintiff's automobile. A jury was waived. The court found for and entered judgment in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $750. Defendant has appealed. This case being a trial to the court without a jury, the appellate court is required to review the case upon both the law and the evidence as in suits of an equitable nature. However, the judgment shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial court to judge of the credibility of the witnesses. Rule 73.01(d), V.A.M.R.; Townsley et al. v. Thielecke et al., Mo.Sup., 349 S.W.2d 902; Masterson v. Plummer, Mo.App., 343 S.W.2d 352; City of St. Peters, Mo. v. Kuester et al., Mo.App., 402 S.W.2d 70.
The basic facts are not in material dispute. On December 22, 1964, plaintiff's 1964 Chevrolet Station Wagon was being operated by his daughter on Dickinson Street, Independence, Missouri, when it collided almost head-on with an automobile being driven at the time by the defendant Avis Pugh. At the time of the casualty plaintiff was insured, as to that particular automobile, with the Equity Mutual Insurance Company. The policy had coverage for collision--$50 deductible. It also contained a subrogation agreement as follows:
. (Italics added).
On March 30, 1965, the insured plaintiff Ernest Ewing, signed a document bearing the caption: 'Sworn statement in proof of loss (automobile)'. We set out the pertinent parts thereof.
'Name of insured--Ernest H. Ewing.
'Chevrolet-Station Wagon--64.
'Coverage--Against the perils of collision.
'Date of loss--A loss occurred on the 22nd day of Dec., 1964.
'Whole loss--The actual loss and damage to above described automobile as a result of said loss was $1,228.70.
'Amount claimed--Insured hereby claims of this company and will accept from this Company in full release and satisfaction in compromise settlement of all claims under this policy the sum of $1178.70.
'Subrogation--The Insured hereby covenants that no release has been or will be given to or settlement or compromise made with any third party who may be liable in damages to the Insured and the Insured in consideration of the payment made under this policy hereby subrogates the said company to all rights and causes of action the said Insured has against any person, persons or corporation whomsoever for damage arising out of or incident to said loss or damage to said property and authorizes said Company to sue in the name of the Insured but at the cost of the Company any such third party, pledging full cooperation in such action.
(Signed) Ernest H. Ewing'.
(Italics added to printed form).
And on the back page:
'The loss or damage for which this claim is made has been made good to my entire satisfaction and I hereby release and discharge the Equity Mutual Ins. Co. from all claims and demands for loss or damage which occurred on or about the 22nd day of Dec., 1964, and authorize payment to Bill Ireland Chevrolet the sum of _ _ Dollars ($_ _), whose receipt for same shall be a complete acquittance.
(Signed) Ernest H. Ewing'.
Plaintiff's petition, filed originally in Magistrate Court, recites occurrence of the accident, alleged defendant's negligence, asserted damage to the vehicle of $2300, pleaded payment of $1178.70 of the loss, assignment of that amount only and asked judgment for $1150. There is presently no dispute on the issue of liability on defendant's part for the damages to plaintiff's automobile.
The plaintiff, Ernest Ewing, testified that at the time of the collision, his 1964 Chevelle Station Wagon was eight months old, had been driven approximately 8,000 miles and had cost $3900 plus, when new. He expressed an opinion that the car was worth $3400 immediately before and $900 immediately after the accident. He said the 'motor was shoved back, the frame sprung'. Three bids for repairs were secured. The car was taken to Bill Ireland Chevrolet and remained there eight weeks before the repairs were fully completed. The delay was occasioned primarily because a factory air conditioner was not immediately available. Plaintiff said his mother had passed away over in Gardner Kansas, and he wanted to use the car, so he called Bill Ireland Chevrolet, was advised the car was ready and told to come and get it. He stated that when he picked up his automobile he 'signed a paper and paid them $80.' He thought the paper 'was a $50 deductible, plus tuning it up after eight weeks'. He drove the automobile to Gardner, Kansas, but 'the battery was dead', and Bill Ireland 'put in a new battery'. He claimed he took the car back every two or three weeks but 'they just refused to do anything else with it'. He said 'the car couldn't be lined up'. 'I put on three sets of tires on the front', 'drove it 10,000 more miles and then traded it'. He admitted that he drove the car during all of 1965 and through at least half of 1966 before he traded it. During this period he said he took the vehicle back to Bill Ireland's on numerous occasions. They 'worked on' the power steering, the paint job, the wheel alignment and with respect to other complaints which he made--all without any further charge. Mr. Ewing said he preferred not to have the car repaired in the first place and that Equity Mutual offered 'to total it out' as a total loss, but he said that would have cost him $1500 off of the original $3900 cost, so he finally agreed for it to be repaired.
It is defendant's position on appeal that the court erred in awarding a judgment to plaintiff because 'plaintiff is not the real party in interest' and further, that to allow plaintiff to recover would subject defendant to multiple suits and in effect sanction the splitting of a cause of action. It is the defendant's contention that Equity Mutual Insurance Company is the real party in interest.
Section 507.010, V.A.M.S. provides that: 'Every action shall be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest, * * *'.
In General Exchange Ins. Corporation v. Young, 357 Mo. 1099, 212 S.W.2d 396, 400, 401, the Supreme Court of Missouri said:
.
We quote from the same court, Steele v. Goosen, Mo.Sup., 329 S.W.2d 703, 711, 712, respecting plaintiff's suit to collect property damages in his own name:
' ' (Italics supplied).
The case of Hoorman v. White, Mo.App., 349 S.W.2d 379, is somewhat...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Holt v. Myers
...manner by this subrogation to the extent of the payment made to the Holts by the insurance carrier. The defendants rely on Ewing v. Pugh, 420 S.W.2d 14 (Mo.App., 1967) and Steele v. Goosen, 329 S.W.2d 703 (Mo., 1959). We, however, conclude that Ewing v. Pugh, supra, failed to distinguish be......
-
Alsup v. Green
...Receipt' is set forth in Footnote 3 appearing on page 436 of Holt. In Holt, the court discussed and sought to distinguish Ewing v. Pugh, 420 S.W.2d 14 (Mo.App.1967), the case on which defendants principally rely. The Kansas City court in Ewing, apparently construed the instrument before it ......
-
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Jessee
...trial the application of the foregoing rule under the facts of this case was controlled by the decision of this court in Ewing v. Pugh, 420 S.W.2d 14 (Mo.App.1967). That case dealt with a settlement by the terms of which the insured agreed to make no compromise with any third party and 'her......
-
Jacobs v. Fodde
...based on it. Steele v. Goosen, Mo., 329 S.W.2d 703, 711; General Exchange Ins. Corp. v. Young, 357 Mo. 1099, 212 S.W.2d 396; Ewing v. Pugh, Mo.App., 420 S.W.2d 14. Defendant contends that the Agreement set out in this opinion constitutes an assignment. We The purpose of this Agreement was t......