Ex Parte Barnett

Decision Date03 June 1914
Docket Number(No. 3163.)
Citation167 S.W. 845
PartiesEx parte BARNETT.
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

Appeal from District Court, Grayson County; W. M. Peck, Judge.

Application by J. H. Barnett for a writ of habeas corpus. From an order denying the writ, the applicant appeals. Appeal dismissed.

C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

HARPER, J.

Appellant was convicted of violating the prohibition law on a trial held in the district court of Grayson county. A motion for new trial was overruled, and notice of appeal given. Subsequent thereto, and after the adjournment of court, relator applied to Judge Peck for a writ of habeas corpus, who set the application down for hearing as to whether or not he would grant the writ. Upon the hearing he refused to grant the writ. Upon such state of facts no appeal lies to this court. Magee v. State, 44 Tex. Cr. R. 385, 71 S. W. 599. Another reason why this case must be dismissed is that, notice of appeal having been given and entered of record, the jurisdiction of this court attached, and all questions raised can be heard and passed on in that appeal, and, as said by Judge Hurt in Ex parte Barfield, 44 S. W. 1095, "relator has no right to the writ of habeas corpus under such a state of facts."

The appeal is dismissed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Ex parte Renier
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • July 1, 1987
    ...Ex parte Johnson, 561 S.W.2d 841 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); Ex parte Lozano, 88 Tex.Cr.R. 112, 225 S.W. 59 (1920); Ex parte Barnett, 74 Tex.Cr.R. 136, 167 S.W. 845 (1914). In such case, the applicant's only remedy is to apply elsewhere. Mayes v. State, 538 S.W.2d 637 (Tex.Cr.App.1976); Ex parte Bla......
  • Ex Parte Smith
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • October 15, 1919
    ...v. Johnson, 27 Tex. 105; Ex parte Ainsworth, 27 Tex. 731; Dirks v. State, 33 Tex. 227; Thomas v. State, 40 Tex. 6; Ex parte Barnett, 74 Tex. Cr. R. 136, 167 S. W. 845; Ex parte Muse, 74 Tex. Cr. R. 476, 168 S. W. 520. A refusal to grant a writ of habeas corpus is not a final judgment, and w......
  • Ex Parte Hughes
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • October 16, 1929
    ...issue the writ. Upon such state of facts no appeal lies to this court. Article 857, Code of Criminal Procedure 1925; Ex parte Barnett, 74 Tex. Cr. R. 136, 167 S. W. 845; Ex parte Lozano, 88 Tex. Cr. R. 112, 225 S. W. 59; Ex parte Smith, 85 Tex. Cr. R. 652, 215 S. W. 299; Ex parte Strong, 34......
  • Ex Parte Noble, 22759.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • December 8, 1943
    ...listed in Section 243, Branch's Ann.Tex. P. C., p. 152, and particularly Ex parte Thomas, 61 Tex.Cr.R. 573, 136 S.W. 60; Ex parte Barnett, 74 Tex.Cr.R. 136, 167 S.W. 845; also 21 Tex.Jur. p. 483, sec. In relator's motion for rehearing he adverts to the Smith case, referred to in our origina......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT