Ex parte Brantley.
| Decision Date | 30 December 1976 |
| Parties | Ex parte Carl BRANTLEY. SC 2205. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial
5 cases
-
Ex parte Randle
...24 Ala.App. 466, 136 So. 483; State v. Plunket, 2 Stew. [Ala.] 11." Id., 46 Ala.App. at 591, 246 So.2d at 478. In Brantly v. State, 340 So.2d 902 (Ala.Crim.App.1976), a fatal variance was found to exist between the indictment that alleged the defendant had escaped or had attempted to escape......
-
Pinkard v. State
...pursuant to lawful arrest). The appellant cites two cases, Eady v. State, Ala.Cr.App., 369 So.2d 841, (1979); Brantley v. State, Ala.Cr.App., 340 So.2d 902 (1976), to support his contention that the absence of the above discussed information was a fatal defect in the indictment. A reading o......
-
Wilson v. State, 8 Div. 708
...to revoke that which had already expired by operation of law. Jackson; Brantley v. State, 340 So.2d 901 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 340 So.2d 902 (Ala.1976). III This case must also be reversed for failure of the circuit court to comply with Armstrong v. State, 294 Ala. 100, 312 So.2d 620 ......
-
Sides v. State, 6 Div. 993
...of probation. In this connection, we refer to Brantley v. State, Ala.Cr.App., per Judge De Carlo, 340 So.2d 901, 902, cert. denied, 340 So.2d 902, in which it is stated: "The application of the speedy trial principle to probation revocation hearings has not been determined in Alabama. This ......
Request a trial to view additional results