Ex parte Bryan
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | HENRY |
| Citation | Ex parte Bryan, 76 Mo. 253 (Mo. 1882) |
| Decision Date | 31 October 1882 |
| Parties | EX PARTE BRYAN. |
Habeas Corpus.
WRIT DENIED.
T. J. Delaney for petitioner.
D. H. McIntyre, Attorney General, contra.
The petitioner states that he is illegally detained and confined in the penitentiary of the State of Missouri under four commitments and judgments of the circuit court of Greene county, and that the illegality consists in the fact that the four indictments were pending against him for felonies alleged to have been committed by him, and that, on his plea of guilty to one of the indictments, he was sentenced to four years' imprisonment in the penitentiary, and that subsequently, on his plea of guilty to two of the other indictments, he was successively sentenced, on the one to four years' imprisonment, and on the other to two years' imprisonment in the penitentiary, and was afterward tried on the fourth indictment, on his plea of not guilty, found guilty and sentenced to imprisonment for ten years in the penitentiary, the imprisonment in each case to commence at the termination of the term of imprisonment to which he was adjudged on prior convictions, as prescribed by section 9, article 9, Wagner's Statutes.
It does not appear from the Warden's return that the petitioner was sentenced on the plea of...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
In re Breck
... ... no matters are to be held within its jurisdiction except they ... expressly appear to be so. Ex parte O'Brien, 127 Mo. 486; ... Rohland v. Railroad, 89 Mo. 180; State v ... Metzger, 26 Mo. 65. (3) And hence it is competent to ... attack the ... regardless of the allegations pleaded in the petition. [Ex ... parte Durbin, 102 Mo. 100, 14 S.W. 821; Ex parte Bryan, 76 ... Mo. 253.] The issue then becomes one of law simply which must ... be tried upon the case made, and no fact dehors the ... record will be ... ...
-
The State ex rel. Meininger v. Breuer
... ... Gilbert & Wolfort for relator ... (1) ... Sec. 3697, R. S. 1919, was construed in Ex parte Meyers, 44 ... Mo. 282, and the court there held that under this section a ... defendant could not be tried after sentence, at a subsequent ... dictum ... Ex parte Meyers, 44 Mo. 279, 282; ... Williamson's Case, 67 Mo. 174; Ex parte Bryan, 76 Mo ... 253, 254; State v. Jolly, 96 Mo. 435, 438; State ... v. Buck, 120 Mo. 479, 496. (3) The soundness of the rule ... that a person ... ...
-
In re Breck
...return are to be taken as true, regardless of the allegations pleaded in the petition. Ex parte Durbin, 102 Mo. 100, 14 S. W. 821; Ex parte Bryan, 76 Mo. 253. The issue then becomes one of law simply which must be tried upon the case made, and no fact dehors the record will be considered. 9......
-
State ex rel. Attorney-General v. Skinker
...habeas corpus proceeding certified to us in this proceeding does not show that petitioner made any such allegation or denial. In Ex parte Bryan, 76 Mo. 253, we held that the facts as they appeared in the return were to be taken as true because not denied. On a similar state of the record in......