Ex Parte Cain
| Decision Date | 23 June 1909 |
| Citation | Ex Parte Cain, 120 S.W. 999, 56 Tex. Cr. R. 539 (Tex. Crim. App. 1909) |
| Parties | Ex parte CAIN. |
| Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
F. J. McCord, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
Appellant presents his application for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging in substance that he is illegally restrained of his liberty and confined by the city marshal of the city of Wichita Falls, and that he is so restrained by virtue of a certain warrant of arrest issued upon a complaint charging him with the violation of a certain city ordinance of the city of Wichita Falls, attached to his application. It is alleged that this ordinance is unconstitutional and void, and that he ought not to be restrained of his liberty by reason of any alleged violation of the same. Attached to the application is a warrant in due form for the arrest of appellant by the recorder of the city of Wichita Falls, and a return by the city marshal reciting in substance that he is held by virtue of said warrant. Accompanying the application is an affidavit by R. V. Guinn, charging in substance a violation of the city ordinance of said city, in that the said relator had made an addition to a wooden building situated within the fire limits, fully described and set out in said affidavit. A copy of the ordinance of the city of Wichita Falls is attached to the application, in which the fire limits of said city are distinctly set out, and it is provided that it shall be unlawful for any person thereafter to erect any building or structure of any other material than brick or stone for the walls, and metal, gravel, or slate for the roof, of such building or structure, except as therein provided. It is provided that any building hereafter erected, having more wood on the outside of the building than that required for the door and window frames, roof, eaves, doors, shutters, sash, porticos, and steps, shall be deemed a wooden building, subject to the penalties imposed by the preceding section; provided, however, that this section shall not be construed so as to prohibit awnings. It is also provided that it shall not be lawful for any person to move any wooden building within the fire limits to any other place within the same, nor from without to within the same, nor to elevate, nor to make an addition to, nor to cover with shingles or other combustible material,...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Ex Parte McKay
...Keeling, 54 Tex. Cr. R. 118, 121 S. W. 605, 130 Am. St. Rep. 884; Ex parte Coleman, 53 Tex. Cr. R. 93, 113 S. W. 17; Ex parte Cain, 56 Tex. Cr. R. 538, 120 S. W. 999; Michie's Cr. Digest, vol. 3, pp. To determine whether or not the criminal district court of Travis county had jurisdiction t......
-
Chemgas v. Tynan
... ... Frisbie v. U.S., 157 U.S. 168, 15 Sup ... [116 P. 1047] ... Ct ... 586, 39 L.Ed. 657; Ex parte Cain, 56 Tex. Cr. R. 538, 120 ... S.W. 999; Caples v. State, 3 Okl. Cr. 72, 104 P. 493, 26 ... L.R.A. (N. S.) 1033; State v. Kirkman, 104 N.C. 911, ... ...
-
Ex Parte Drane
...Cox, 53 Tex. Cr. R. 240, 109 S. W. 369; Ex parte Webb, 113 S. W. 545; Ex parte Wolf, 55 Tex. Cr. R. 231, 115 S. W. 1192; Ex parte Cain, 56 Tex. Cr. R. 539, 120 S. W. 999; Ex parte Knapp, 57 Tex. Cr. R. 411, 123 S. W. 597; Ex parte Hendrix, 64 Tex. Cr. R. 452, 142 S. W. The so-called Pure Fo......
-
First Nat. Bank v. Lee County Cotton Oil Co.
...v. Houston Oil Co. of Texas (Tex. Civ. App.) 194 S. W. 422; Texas & Pac. Ry. Co. v. Mosley, 103 Tex. 79, 124 S. W. 90; Ex parte Cain, 56 Tex. Cr. R. 538, 120 S. W. 999. It was clearly the intention of the Legislature, in passing the Uniform Negotiable Instruments Act, to cover the whole rel......