Ex Parte Coleman
Decision Date | 12 February 1908 |
Parties | Ex parte COLEMAN. |
Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Application for a writ of habeas corpus by William H. Coleman. Writ denied. Petitioner remanded.
Crawford & Lamar and M. L. Dye, for appellant. Walter F. Seay, Lee Richardson, and F. J. McCord, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
This is an original application for a writ of habeas corpus, which was granted by this court, and relator insists that he is illegally restrained of his liberty by A. L. Ledbetter, sheriff of Dallas county, Tex., for various reasons, and asks this court to release him. After the original application was granted by this court, the sheriff came in and made return showing that he held relator in custody under a writ of arrest issued by John G. Bradley, clerk of the criminal court of Jefferson county, Ala.; second, a warrant of arrest issued by J. F. Williams, justice of the peace, precinct No. 1, Dallas county, Tex.; third, an authorization for the person of Henry Coleman, issued to Robert L. Collier on January 7, 1908, by B. B. Comer, Governor of the state of Alabama, a copy of which is attached; fourth, an executive warrant for the custody of Henry Coleman, issued on the 13th day of January, 1908, by his excellency, T. M. Campbell, Governor of the state of Texas. A copy of all of said papers is attached to the sheriff's return.
After the above return was made, the sheriff amended his return, which was entirely proper. The same shows that, in addition to the above, he holds relator by virtue of (a) an affidavit filed by Elisha A. Reeves in the criminal court of Jefferson county, Ala., on the 6th day of January, 1908, charging the relator with murder; (b) a petition, filed and sworn to by H. P. Heflin, solicitor of Jefferson county, Ala., signed and sworn to on the 6th day of January, A. D. 1908, which petition prays for the extradition of relator, to the end that he may be returned to the state of Alabama to be prosecuted for the crime of murder; (c) a warrant of arrest, issued by S. L. Weaver, judge of the criminal court of Jefferson county, Ala., for the arrest of the relator on a charge of murder, the said warrant being issued on January 6, 1908; (d) a requisition issued by the Governor of the state of Alabama, directed to the Governor of the state of Texas, requesting that the relator be apprehended and delivered to Robert L. Collier, to be conveyed to the state of Alabama, to be prosecuted for the crime of murder of which he stands charged in the state of Alabama; (e) a written authorization, issued by the Governor of the state of Alabama, which confers authority on Robert L. Collier to receive for the authorities of the state of Alabama, to answer to a charge of murder alleged to have been committed in said state, the said authorization having been issued on January 7, 1908, a copy of which is attached to the relator's petition, and the original of which is on file in this court; (f) an executive warrant issued by the Governor of the state of Texas, on January 13, 1908, which warrant authorizes the relator's delivery to Robert L. Collier, to be conveyed to the state of Alabama, to be tried on a charge of murder in said state, a copy of which executive warrant is attached to relator's petition filed herein, and the original of which is on file in this court.
The requisition of the Governor of the state of Alabama reads as follows:
The affidavit upon which said requisition of the Governor of Alabama is issued is as follows:
The accompanying affidavit of Elisha A. Reeves reads as follows:
The warrant of arrest is as follows:
The certificate of the clerk to said warrant is indorsed thereon as follows:
The requisition issued by the Governor of the state of Texas is as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ex Parte McKay
...as are founded on an unconstitutional law (Ex parte Keeling, 54 Tex. Cr. R. 118, 121 S. W. 605, 130 Am. St. Rep. 884; Ex parte Coleman, 53 Tex. Cr. R. 93, 113 S. W. 17; Ex parte Cain, 56 Tex. Cr. R. 538, 120 S. W. 999; Michie's Cr. Digest, vol. 3, pp. To determine whether or not the crimina......
-
State v. Cox
...with the California authorities so that they always knew of his whereabouts. This very proposition was rejected in Ex parte Coleman, 53 Tex.Cr.R. 93, 113 S.W. 17 (1908). See also People v. Ogilvie, 36 Ill.2d 566, 224 N.E.2d 247 (1967). Moreover, appellee's position is inconsistent with the ......
-
Ex Parte Nix
...the laws of the state of Oklahoma to charge the offense named. The test is its sufficiency in the demanding state. Coleman v. State, 53 Tex. Cr. R. 93, 113 S. W. 17; Pearce v. Texas, 155 U. S. 311, 15 Sup. Ct. 116, 39 L. Ed. 164. The requisition was not introduced in evidence, and objection......
-
Ex Parte Roselle
...of the state under the law of the demanding state. Pearce v. Texas, 155 U. S. 311, 15 Sup. Ct. 116, 39 L. Ed. 164; Coleman v. State, 53 Tex. Cr. R. 99, 113 S. W. 17; Ex parte Pearce, 32 Tex. Cr. R. 307, 23 S. W. That the prosecuting attorney of Wheatland, Wyo., was permitted to state that, ......