Ex parte Conners

Decision Date24 May 2002
Citation837 So.2d 326
PartiesEx parte Charles E. CONNERS. (Re Charles E. Conners v. State of Alabama).
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Charles E. Conners, pro se.

Submitted on petitioner's brief only.

Prior report: Ala.Cr.App., 837 So.2d 319.

MOORE, Chief Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied. In a per curiam opinion holding that Ex parte Berry, 794 So.2d 307 (Ala. 2000), does not control Charles E. Conners's case, the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment. In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals' opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

HOUSTON, LYONS, JOHNSTONE, and WOODALL, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Ex parte Deramus
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • March 21, 2003
    ...to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements, of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals' opinion." Ex parte Conners, 837 So.2d 326 (Ala.2002). Deramus challenged his removal from the work-release program and his reclassification as a "heinous offender." The documents......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT