Ex parte Davis
Decision Date | 19 October 1939 |
Docket Number | A-9752. |
Citation | 95 P.2d 915,68 Okla.Crim. 29 |
Parties | Ex parte DAVIS. |
Court | United States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma |
Syllabus by the Court.
1. The review of a judgment of conviction and imprisonment by writ of habeas corpus is limited to jurisdictional error.
2. Where a prisoner in custody under sentence of conviction seeks to be discharged on habeas corpus the inquiry is limited to the question whether the court in which the prisoner was convicted had jurisdiction of his person and of the crime charged; and if the trial court had jurisdiction to convict and sentence, the writ cannot issue to correct mere errors.
Proceeding on the application of A. B. C. Davis for a writ of habeas corpus to be directed to Jess F. Dunn, Warden of the State Penitentiary, wherein the Attorney General filed a demurrer to the petition, and the cause was submitted on the petition and the demurrer.
Demurrer sustained, writ denied, and cause dismissed.
A. B C. Davis, in pro. per.
Mac Q Williamson, Atty. Gen., and Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty Gen., for respondent.
The petitioner, A. B. C. Davis, filed his petition for a writ of habeas corpus in this court by mail, wherein it is alleged that he is unlawfully imprisoned and detained in the State Penitentiary at McAlester, by respondent, Jess F. Dunn, under a commitment issued out of the district court of Oklahoma County, upon a judgment rendered in said court upon a verdict finding said petitioner guilty of the crime of murder.
It is further alleged that:
"The said imprisonment, detention, confinement, and restraint are illegal; and the illegality thereof consists in this to wit.
The Ku-Klux-Klan practiced a fraud on this petitioner, the Court, and Society. I cite their own evidence as evidence.
I obtained a part of the printed evidence adduced in a Military Court in Oklahoma City, in the fall of 1923, when Governor Walton secured the membership roaster of the Klan, and compelled some three hundred of its members to testify under oath. I obtained this printed evidence at the Historical Society, State Capitol, and filed it with the pardon and parole attorney. Following is in substance, their testimony.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ex parte O'Hara
...66 Okl.Cr. 30, 38, 89 P.2d 363; Ex parte Keel, 62 Okl.Cr. 277, 71 P.2d 313; Ex parte Newman, 67 Okl.Cr. 401, 94 P.2d 556; Ex parte Davis, 68 Okl.Cr. 29, 95 P.2d 915; parte West, 62 Okl.Cr. 260, 71 P.2d 129. In the Keel case supra [62 Okl.Cr. 277, 71 P.2d 314], this court said: 'On habeas co......
-
Ex parte Cartwright
... ... 213] parte Massengale, 67 ... Okl.Cr. 181, 93 P.2d 41; Ex parte Barnette, 67 Okl.Cr. 300, ... 94 P.2d 18; In re Swaim, 66 Okl.Cr. 30, 38, 89 P.2d ... 363; Ex parte Keel, 62 Okl.Cr. 277, 71 P.2d 313; Ex parte ... Newman, 67 Okl.Cr. 401, 94 P.2d 556; Ex parte Davis, 68 ... Okl.Cr. 29, 95 P.2d 915; Ex parte West, 62 ... ...
-
Ex parte Noble
... ... 21, 117 P.2d 550; Ex ... parte Massengale, 67 Okl.Cr. 181, 93 P.2d 41; Ex parte ... Barnett, 67 Okl.Cr. 300, 94 P.2d 18; In re Swaim, 66 ... Okl.Cr. 30, 38, 89 P. 363; Ex parte Keel, 62 Okl.Cr. 277, 71 ... P.2d 313; Ex parte Newman, 67 Okl.Cr. 401, 94 P.2d 556; Ex ... parte Davis, [89 Okla.Crim. 235] 68 Okl.Cr. 29, 95 P.2d 915; ... Ex parte West, 62 Okl.Cr. 260, 71 P.2d 129 ... It has ... also been held that habeas corpus is not a substitute for ... appeal. Ex parte Critser, Okl.Cr.App., 198 P.2d 228, not yet ... reported in State reports; Ex parte ... ...
-
Ex parte Merton
... ... 21, 117 P.2d 550; Ex parte Massengale, ... 67 Okl.Cr. 181, 93 P.2d 41; Ex parte Barnett, 67 Okl.Cr. 300, ... 94 P.2d 18; In re Swaim, 66 Okl.Cr. 30, 38, 89 P.2d ... 363; Ex parte Keel, 62 Okl.Cr. 277, 71 P.2d 313; Ex parte ... Newman, 67 Okl.Cr. 401, 94 P.2d 556; Ex parte Davis, 68 ... Okl.Cr. 29, 95 P.2d 915; Ex parte West, 62 Okl.Cr. 260, 71 ... P.2d 129. Here all the foregoing requisites to jurisdiction ... were present, to the rendition of a valid judgment ... The ... petition herein is entirely insufficient to attack the ... judgment and ... ...