Ex Parte Dumas, 20646.
Decision Date | 01 November 1939 |
Docket Number | No. 20646.,20646. |
Parties | Ex parte DUMAS. |
Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Brazoria County; M. S. Munson, Judge.
Ex parte proceeding by J. H. Dumas for a writ of habeas corpus to review alleged irregularities incident to the trial of J. H. Dumas for a criminal offense. From an order denying relief, J. H. Dumas appeals.
Affirmed.
Robt. M. Lyles and Floyd Enlow, both of Angleton, for appellant.
Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.
In 1934 appellant was convicted in Lubbock County, Texas, of horse theft and under averments of prior convictions for felonies under Art. 63, P.C., he was adjudged to be an habitual criminal and his punishment was assessed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for life.
On June 21, 1939 there was presented to Hon. M. S. Munson, District Judge of Brazoria County, Texas, an application for the writ of habeas corpus in which appellant was seeking to have reviewed alleged irregularities incident to appellant's trial in 1934. In the application for the writ appellant represented that he was illegally restrained of his liberty by L. R. Johnson in the capacity of agent of the State Board of Pardons and Paroles for the State of Texas. On June 22d Judge Munson granted the prayed for writ, directing Mr. Johnson to appear on June 26th and show cause why he restrained appellant. In obedience to the writ Mr. Johnson appeared and filed the following answer.
"
After a hearing on July 5th, Judge Munson entered the following order.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People ex rel. Zangrillo v. Doherty
... ... the time of the hearing, there is nothing for the court to adjudicate' [40 Misc.2d 509] (Ex parte Davis, 11 Okl.Cr. 403, 404, 146 P. 1085). Accordingly, the questions intended to be raised will ... the petitioner's contention that he was under restraint by the terms of his parole (Ex parte Dumas, 137 Tex.Cr. 524, 132 S.W. 2d 883, 884; See also to the same effect the Minnesota case of State ex ... ...
-
White v. Gladden
...5 Cir., 1938, 99 F.2d 511; Ex parte Kirk, 16 Okl.Cr. 722, 185 P. 706; Ex parte Cindle, 71 Okl.Cr. 135, 109 P.2d 519; Ex parte Dumas, 137 Tex.Cr.R. 524, 132 S.W.2d 883. There is a striking resemblance to the case at bar in United States ex rel. St. John v. Cummings, supra, decided by the Uni......
-
Ex parte Trillo, 52571
...and not to the language which purports to overrule many decisions not necessary to the decision. 1 These include Ex parte Dumas, 137 Tex.Cr.R. 524, 132 S.W.2d 883 (1939); Ex parte Villafranca, 147 Tex.Cr.R. 610, 183 S.W.2d 461 (1944); Ex parte Cravens, 153 Tex.Cr.R. 341, 220 S.W.2d 467 (194......
-
Ex Parte Villafranca
...44 Tex.Cr.R. 423, 71 S.W. 593, 60 L.R.A. 631, 100 Am.St.Rep. 871; Ex parte Calhoun, 127 Tex. 54, 91 S. W.2d 1047; and Ex parte Dumas, 137 Tex. Cr.R. 524, 132 S.W.2d 883); but constructive custody arises only when a restraint or custody of some character is exercised. Ex parte Dumas, So, the......