Ex parte George, A-8518
Decision Date | 03 January 1962 |
Docket Number | No. A-8518,A-8518 |
Parties | Ex Parte Sherman D. GEORGE. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Mandell & Wright, Tom Kirtley with above firm, Houston, for relator.
Baker, Botts, Andrews & Shepherd, John B. Abercrombie of above firm, Houston, Armstrong, Bedford & Lambdin, Galveston, for respondent.
This is an original habeas corpus proceeding wherein petitioner S. D. George seeks release from a conviction for contempt. George claims that the temporary injunction granted by the 10th Judicial District Court of Galveston County, Texas, is and was void because the Court was without jurisdiction to order the injunction. George contends, therefore, that his single act of picketing in 'violation' of the injunction cannot be made the basis of a contempt conviction, since it was, at most, a 'violation' of a void order.
The contempt proceeding originated in the district court upon the motion of The American Oil Company, wherein it was alleged that George and National Maritime Union of America, AFL-CIO, were in contempt and disobedience of the Court's prior order granting a temporary injunction and of the writ of temporary injunction issued pursuant thereto.
On July 3, 1961, the hearing on the motion proceeded to trial. The matter was submitted to the Court on the pleadings and stipulated facts.
After considering the motion alleging that George and National Maritime Union of America, AFL-CIO, were in contempt of court, and the lawful evidence, and stipulation of the parties, the Court adjudged the Union not guilty of contempt. Although American duly excepted to such action of the Court, the question so far as the Union is concerned is not before this Court for review.
However, the Court ordered, adjudged, and decreed George guilty of contempt of court '* * * by intentional and wilful disobedience and violation of a valid subsisting writ of temporary injunction lawfully issued and theretofore duly served upon him pursuant to a lawful subsisting order of this Court, in that Sherman D. George, while said writ of temporary injunction was in full force, * * * picketed The American Oil Company refinery entrance located at and known as the Main Gate on Fifth Avenue South in the City of Texas City, Galveston County, Texas, by the said Sherman D. George repeatedly and continuously walking back and forth on the roadway across and in close proximity in front of that refinery entrance while carrying and displaying a large sign on which the following words were printed in large and clearly legible letters:
The Court found that such picketing at this time by George had been explicily enjoined by the following provisions of the temporary injunction:
'NOW THEREFORE, you the said National Maritime Union of America AFL-CIO, Sherman D. George, and all of the officers, agents, representatives and members of said National Maritime Union of America, AFL-CIO, and those acting in concert with you, are hereby restrained and enjoined from picketing the refinery entrances located and known as the Main Gate on Fifth Avenue South, and the Grant Avenue Parking Lot Gate on Grant Avenue, both in the City of Texas City, and County of Galveston, Texas, serving the refinery of The American Oil Company at Texas City, Texas, * * *.'
The pertinent findings of fact by the trial court based upon the record and the stipulated facts by the parties are these:
'3.
'At the time the order granting temporary injunction referred to in 2. above was in open court rendered by the Court, Sherman D. George was personally present in the court room, and Sherman D. George fully understood the provisions and effect of, and the reasons for, the aforesaid order granting temporary injunction.'
'7.
'At 2:55 o'clock p. m., on June 23, 1961, R. F. Nunn, a duly authorized Deputy of J. B. Kline, duly elected and qualified Sheriff of Galveston County, Texas, personally served a true copy of the aforesaid writ of temporary injunction referred to in 5. above on the N.M.U., and a similar copy on Sherman D. George, by personally handing both of said copies to Sherman D. George at Galveston, Texas, Sherman D. George then being Port Agent at Galveston of the N.M.U. and as such being a proper agent for service of such writ on the N.M.U.
'8.
'Subsequent to the service on him of the writ of temporary injunction, as referred to in 7. above, and on June 23, 1961, Sherman D. George read the provisions of the writ of temporary injunction and fully understood the provisions thereof; and thereafter, but prior to June 27, 1961, Sherman D. George publicly announced in effect that he intended to violate the provisions of the aforesaid temporary injunction by picketing at The American Oil Company refinery at Texas City because he did not believe that this Court had jurisdiction to issue the order granting the temporary injunction.
'9.
'Therefore, and without any inducement or agreement thereto by The American Oil Company, * * * on the 27th day of June, 1961, Sherman D. George went to The American Oil Company refinery entrance, located at and known as the Main Gate on Fifth Avenue South' and picketed that refinery gate as heretofore indicated.
'10
'George at all times knew that the Court's order and the temporary injunction were in effect and had not been modified or set aside either in whole or in part.'
'15.
'The Court further finds that there is in the record before the Court no circumstance in mitigation of the actions of Sherman D. George * * *.
'16.
'The Court further finds that the following facts were true on June 20, 1961, at the time The American Oil Company filed in the above numbered and styled cause its petition seeking the temporary injunction that is involved in this hearing, and were true on June 22, 1961, at the time of the hearing on the application for temporary injunction, and at the time of the issuance and service on Sherman D. George and the N.M.U. of the writ of temporary injunction that it violated in this hearing, and were true at all intermediate times and at all other times material to the issues involved in this hearing:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Windward Shipping (London) Limited v. American Radio Ass'n AFL-CIO
...Agricultural Trade Development and Assistance Act was held to be arguably protected by section 7 of the L.M.R.A. In Ex Parte George, 163 Tex. 103, 358 S.W.2d 590 (1962), vacated 371 U.S. 72, 83 S.Ct. 178, 9 L.Ed.2d 133 (1963), on remand 364 S.W.2d 189 (Tex.Sup.1963), an American maritime un......
-
South Atlantic & Gulf Coast Dist. of Intern. Longshoremen's Ass'n, Independent v. Harris County-Houston Ship Channel Nav. Dist.
...and its employees would seem to bring this case within subdivision (3) quoted above from the Dilley case. We note also that in Ex parte George, 358 S.W.2d 590, the Supreme Court of Texas 'Relator refers to our opinion in Ex parte Dilley, supra, wherein we said: 'There now seems to be four m......
-
Amalgamated Meat Cut. v. Carl's Meat & Provision Co.
...371 U.S. 72, 83 S.Ct. 178, 9 L.Ed.2d 133 (1962), vacating and reversing the decision of the Supreme Court of Texas reported in 163 Tex. 103, 358 S.W.2d 590 (1962). As was said in George: 'The District Court was without jurisdiction if petitioner's picketing was arguably prohibited or arguab......
-
Millwrights Local Union No. 2484 v. Rust Engineering Co., 6972
...371 U.S. 72, 83 S.Ct. 178, 9 L.Ed.2d 133 (1962). Reading this opinion, the opinion of the Supreme Court of Texas reported in 163 Tex. 103, 358 S.W.2d 590, it is clear that George was a member of the National Maritime Union of America, which union was engaged in a labor dispute with the Amer......