Ex parte Greene, 39658
Decision Date | 08 June 1966 |
Docket Number | No. 39658,39658 |
Citation | 406 S.W.2d 465 |
Parties | Ex parte George H. GREENE, Jr. |
Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
W. C. Wiebusch, Houston, for appellant.
Carol S. Vance, Dist. Atty., James C. Brough and Richard DeGuerin, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, and Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.
This is an appeal from an order in a habeas corpus proceeding in which appellant was remanded to the custody of the Chief of Police of the City of Houston.
The avowed purpose of this proceeding is to test the sufficiency of the complaint upon which appellant has not yet been tried and to test the form of the bail bonds required by the City of Houston.
In Ex parte Jarvis, 109 Tex.Cr.R. 52, 3 S.W.2d 84, 57 A.L.R. 82, Judge Hawkins speaking for the Court said:
'In the present case the effort is to have this court declare in a habeas corpus proceeding that a particular information fails to charge the violation of a law, the existence of which is not questioned.
Whatever may be the rule in other jurisdictions it seems to be the settled policy in this state not to permit resort to habeas corpus proceedings primarily for the purpose of testing the sufficiency of a complaint or indictment in advance of a trial in the lower court.'
Later in Ex parte Drenner, 125 Tex.Cr.R. 331, 67 S.W.2d 870, this Court said:
See also Article 11.45, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P.
The judgment remanding appellant is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ex parte Mattox
...Ex parte Ward, 560 S.W.2d 660 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); Ex parte Dickerson, 549 S.W.2d 202 (Tex.Cr.App.1977); Ex parte Greene, 406 S.W.2d 465 (Tex.Cr.App.1966); Ex parte Drenner, 125 Tex.Cr.R. 331, 67 S.W.2d 870 (1934); Ex parte Jarvis, 109 Tex.Cr.R. 52, 3 S.W.2d 84 (1928); Ex parte Webb, 113 S.W.......