Ex Parte Harrison
Decision Date | 19 May 1908 |
Citation | 212 Mo. 88,110 S.W. 709 |
Parties | Ex parte HARRISON. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Habeas corpus on petition of Allen O. Harrison. Writ granted. Petitioner discharged.
House & Manard and J. McD. Trimble, for petitioner. I. B. Kimbrell, for respondent.
This is a proceeding under the habeas corpus act, in which petitioner seeks to be discharged from further prosecution under an information filed by the prosecuting attorney of Jackson county, in the criminal court of said county on the 9th of March, 1908, charging the petitioner with a violation of an act passed by the Legislature of this state and approved April 12, 1907, entitled "An act to regulate civic leagues and like associations and providing how their reports and recommendations shall be published and what they shall contain, and fixing a penalty for the violation of, and liability for the same." Laws Mo. 1907, p. 261. A warrant was duly issued upon the information, and the petitioner was arrested. The said information charges:
That the Kansas City Civic League is and was at all times therein mentioned a league, society, and association incorporated under chapter 12, art. 11, Rev. St. 1899 (Ann. St. 1906, pp. 1103-1119), and was formed for the purpose of investigating the character, fitness, and qualifications of candidates and nominees for public office. That it was at all times mentioned, and for a long time prior thereto, the custom and purpose of said Kansas City League to make reports and recommendations on such candidates. That on the 24th of December, 1907, in Kansas City, Jackson county, Mo., the said Kansas City Civic League did, through its executive committee then and there in executive session assembled, write, make, and adopt a recommendation and report upon the fitness and qualification of John M. Rood and William J. Campbell, who were then and there candidates and nominees for the election to the office of sheriff of Jackson county, Mo., at the special election to be held in said county on the 27th of December, 1907, which said recommendation and report, with the signatures of the president and secretary of the said Kansas City Civic League, is in words and figures as follows:
That said report and recommendation did not state in full on what facts the said report and recommendation was based, and did not give or contain the name or address of any person or persons furnishing the information of and concerning said candidates and nominees in said report and recommendation contained, or upon which said report was based. That on the 24th day of December, 1907, said Allen O. Harrison, who was then and there a secretary of said Kansas City Civic League, did unlawfully and willfully deliver a copy of said report and recommendation to the Burd & Fletcher Printing Company in Kansas City, Jackson county, Mo., and caused 250 copies thereof to be printed and published by said printing company upon postal cards of the United States, and did thereafter on said 24th of December, 1907, unlawfully and willfully place upon said postal cards, upon which said report and recommendation had been printed, the names and addresses...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Commonwealth v. McKenty
... ... 96; Weiss v ... Swift & Co., 36 Pa.Super. 376 ... Error ... in sentence cannot be corrected on writ of habeas corpus: Ex ... parte Lange, 85 U.S. 163; Ex parte Parks, 93 U.S. 18; ... Sennott's Case, 146 Mass. 489 (16 N.E. 448); ... Stalker's Petition, 167 Mass. 11; Seller's ... In re Fong Yim, 134 F. 938; Crooms v ... Schad, 51 Fla. 168 (40 So. 497); Alvarez v ... State, 50 Fla. 24 (39 So. 481); In re Harrison, ... 212 Mo. 88 (110 S.W. 709) ... Before ... Rice, P. J., Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Head and Porter, ... [52 ... ...
-
Ashley v. Wait
...Adams v. Lansdon, 18 Idaho, 483, 110 Pac. 280;State v. Pierce, 163 Wis. 615, 158 N. W. 696; Ex parte Harrison, 212 Mo. 88, 110 S. W. 709,16 L. R. A. (N. S.) 950, 126 Am. St. Rep. 557,15 Ann. Cas. 1. 4. It has been assumed in favor of the petitioner in the discussion thus far, without examin......
-
Cheek v. Prudential Ins. Co.
...Missouri, § 53, art. 4; Amendments to Constitution of the United States, § 1, art. 14; Ex parte Harrison, 212 Mo. 88, 110 S. W. 709, 16 L. R. A. (N. S.) 950, 126 Am. St. Rep. 557, 15 Ann. Cas. 1; Wallace v. Railway Co., 94 Ga. 732, 22 S. E. 579; Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Ry. Co. v. Brown,......
-
State ex rel. Pulitzer Pub. Co. v. Coleman
...abuse of that liberty." Mo. Const., Art. II, Sec. 14; Marx & Haas Jeans Clothing Co. v. Watson, 168 Mo. 133, 67 S.W. 391; Ex parte Harrison, 212 Mo. 88, 110 S.W. 709; Life Assn. v. Boogher, 3 Mo. App. 173. (6) The order and judgment of the court is void because it is in contravention of Art......