Ex Parte Harrison
Decision Date | 07 December 1938 |
Docket Number | No. 19945.,19945. |
Citation | 122 S.W.2d 314 |
Parties | Ex parte HARRISON. |
Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Lubbock County; E. L. Pitts, Judge.
Habeas corpus proceeding by Homer Harrison for his release from jail to which he was committed after being convicted in the corporation court of the city of Lubbock for parking his automobile in a meter parking space without depositing 5 cents in the meter. From a judgment of the district court recommitting the relator to jail, he appeals.
Affirmed.
Bean, Evans & Bean, of Lubbock, for appellant.
Bradley & Wilson, City Attys., of Lubbock, H. P. Kucera, City Atty., of Dallas, R. R. Lewis, City Atty., and George D. Neal, Asst. City Atty., both of Houston, W. D. Girand, Jr., of Amarillo, W. D. Benson, Jr., of Lubbock, amici curiæ.
Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.
Relator was convicted in the corporation court of the City of Lubbock for parking his automobile in a meter parking space without depositing a nickel in the meter. After being committed to jail he applied to the district judge of Lubbock County for a writ of habeas corpus. The writ was granted, a hearing was had, and he was again committed to the city jail. Hence this appeal.
Relator contends that the parking meter ordinance of the City of Lubbock is invalid in that it imposes a fee for the use of the streets and "constitutes a violation of the city's contractual authority" over its streets.
Under the terms of the ordinance, the city was given authority to purchase parking meters to be placed by each zone in the city. No person is permitted to park his automobile in the designated areas without first depositing a five cent coin in the meter. The time limit for the occupancy of the places set apart is two hours. Section 18 of the ordinance reads as follows:
"That it shall be unlawful and an offense for any person to deposit or cause to be deposited in the parking meter within any of the parking meter zones as herein established a five cent coin of the United States of America for the purpose of extending the parking time of the vehicle occupying said parking space beyond the period of time fixed by this ordinance as the parking limit for the parking meter zone within which said parking meter is located."
Section 19 provides:
"That it shall be unlawful and an offense for any person, firm or corporation to allow, permit or suffer any vehicle registered in his, her, their or its name to be parked overtime, for a longer period of time continuously in said parking space than the parking limit provided by this ordinance for the parking meter zone within which said vehicle is so parked."
Section 25 is in language as follows:
"The five cent coins required to be deposited in the parking meters as provided herein are hereby levied as a police regulation, supervision and inspection fee to cover the cost of inspection, supervision and regulation involved in the installation, operation, upkeep and maintenance and the use of the parking space and parking meters described herein, and involved in checking up and regulating the parking of vehicles in the parking meter zone created hereby."
Further, it is provided in the ordinance that the money collected from the use of the meters shall be deposited to the credit of the city in the "Parking Meter Fund."
The City of Lubbock is operating under the provisions of Art. 11, Sec. 5, of the Constitution of Texas, Vernon's Ann.St. Const. Art. 11, § 5, giving cities of more than five thousand inhabitants the right to adopt charters subject to such limitations as may be prescribed by the Legislature, and the right to levy, assess, and collect such taxes as may be authorized by law or their charters. Under the terms of Art. 1175, Revised Civil Statutes, Home Rule Cities are given "exclusive dominion, control, and jurisdiction in, over and under the public streets, avenues, alleys, highways and boulevards, and public grounds" of such cities. Also the statute gives to such cities the right "to license, operate and control the operation of all character of vehicles using the public streets, including motorcycles, automobiles or like vehicles." The ordinance was within the general charter powers of the city and the provisions of Art. 1175, supra. The reason for its enactment is shown in the preamble, which reads as follows:
The primary right of the citizen to the use of the streets for the purpose of travel thereon does not carry with it the right to "store his vehicle in the street for his business convenience." Harper v. City of Wichita Falls, Tex.Civ.App., 105 S.W.2d 743, 750. While owners and non-owners of abutting property have the right to the use of the street for travel thereon and also the right of ingress and egress to and from property...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Foster's Inc. v. Boise City
...public in its parking; in short, to prevent overtime parking, and thus create a greater movement of traffic." Texas, Ex Parte Harrison, 135 Tex. Crim. 611, 122 S.W.2d 314; Harper v. City of Wichita Falls, Tex. Civ. App., 105 S.W.2d 743; West Virginia, County Court of Webster County v. Roman......
-
Wilhoit v. City of Springfield
... ... amount to enable the city to substitute the meters for the ... previous system of regulation. Ex Parte Smith, 231 ... Mo. 111, 132 S.W. 607; Pierce City v. Hentschel, 180 ... S.W. 1027; Pierce City v. Hentschel, 210 S.W. 31 ... (4) The facts ... 314; Ex Parte Duncan, 179 ... Okl. 355, 65 P.2d 1015; Harper v. City of Wichita ... Falls, 105 S.W.2d 743; Ex Parte Harrison, 122 ... S.W.2d 314; County Court of Webster County v. Roman, ... 3 S.E.2d 631; Owens v. Owens, Mayor, 8 S.E.2d 339; ... Kimmel v. City of ... ...
-
State v. Scoggin
...179 Okl. 355, 65 P.2d 1015; William Laubach & Sons v. City of Easton, 347 Pa. 542, 32 A.2d 881; Owens v. Owens, supra; Ex parte Harrison, 135 Tex. Cr. 611, 122 S.W.2d 314; Webster County Court v. Roman, 121 W.Va. 381, 3 S.E.2d 631. The regulations operate alike on all motorists. They classi......
-
City of Louisville v. Louisville Auto. Club, Inc.
... ... require a reduction so as to remove the objectionable ... In the ... case of Ex parte Duncan, 179 Okl. 355, 65 P.2d 1015, 1017, ... where the same contention was made, the court remarked: ... "If the city has the power to regulate ... The majority ... opinions uphold validity. To those which we have referred to ... above we may add: Ex parte Harrison, 135 Tex.Cr.R. 611, 122 ... S.W.2d 314; In re Opinion of Justices, 297 Mass ... 559, 8 N.E.2d 179; Gilsey Buildings, Inc., v ... Incorporated ... ...