Ex parte Herrera, 66218

Citation608 S.W.2d 683
Decision Date10 December 1980
Docket NumberNo. 66218,66218
PartiesEx parte Luis HERRERA, Appellant.
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
OPINION

DOUGLAS, Judge.

This is a post conviction habeas corpus proceeding under Article 11.07, V.A.C.C.P. The applicant was convicted in 1979 in cause number 17,354 in the 49th District Court of Webb County for the offense of murder.

The applicant contends that the trial court did not have jurisdiction to try the cause because of fundamental error in the indictment in which an impossible date for the commission of the offense was alleged.

The date of the offense was alleged to have been committed "on or about the 10th day of November A. D. 19 8 and anterior to the presentment of the indictment...."

Many cases have held that an indictment is fundamentally defective if it alleges that the offense was committed on an impossible date. See Ex parte Millard, 587 S.W.2d 703 (Tex.Cr.App.1979), and Barnes v. State, 42 Tex.Cr.R. 297, 59 S.W. 882 (1900). It is impossible that appellant could have committed the offense in "19 8 ".

The relief sought is granted. The applicant is ordered discharged from custody in this cause.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Gibson v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • April 20, 1989
    ...in which the crime was committed, the indictment is void on its face. TEX.CODE CRIM.PRO.ANN. art. 15.05 (Vernon 1977); Ex parte Herrera, 608 S.W.2d 683 (Tex.Cr.App.1980); Ex parte Millard, 587 S.W.2d 703 (Tex.Cr.App.1979). We note that the trial judge, who heard appellant's motion to enforc......
  • Ex parte Gibson
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • March 30, 2021
  • Ex parte Mohamed
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • August 25, 2021
  • Rodriguez v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • January 21, 1988
    ...cases, although the ability or inability of an accused to make bail does not alone control in determining the amount. Ex parte Herrera, 608 S.W.2d 683 (Tex.Crim.App.1980). In McCartin v. State, 666 S.W.2d 170 (Tex.App.--Corpus Christi 1983, no pet.), we upheld an appeal bail for robbery set......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT