Ex parte Johnson

Decision Date01 January 1884
Citation19 N.W. 594,15 Neb. 512
PartiesEX PARTE HIBBERT JOHNSON
CourtNebraska Supreme Court

WRIT DENIED.

Hastings & McGintie, for the petitioner.

OPINION

REESE, J.

This is an original application for a writ of habeas corpus.

There are two questions presented upon which the writ is sought.

1st. It is claimed that the justice of the peace before whom the petitioner was tried and convicted upon a criminal complaint was not in fact such officer; but he claimed, held, and usurped said office without authority of law.

It clearly appears from the petition and copies of the docket entries attached, that the justice claims to hold and exercise the functions of his office by right.

It is well settled that the acts of an officer de facto are valid, and it as clearly appears that the justice before whom the petitioner was tried and convicted was, at least, an officer de facto.

Again, the title to an office, by which one holds and exercises the functions of such office, cannot be litigated in this collateral way. It can only be done by a direct proceeding instituted for that purpose.

2d. It is contended by the applicant that the mittimus by which he is held is void, it being a command to detain him until the next term of the district court, when it should have been until the fine and costs assessed against him were paid. By reference to the docket entry of the justice, we find the following recital: "Said defendant refused to pay the above fine and costs. I therefore issued mittimus committing him to the common jail of said county until said fine and costs be paid, or he be otherwise discharged by due course of law." The fine and costs have not been paid. The writ is therefore denied. By the court,

WRIT DENIED.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Walcott v. Wells
    • United States
    • Nevada Supreme Court
    • July 12, 1890
    ... ... 231; Sheehan's Case, 122 ... Mass. 445; Com. v. Taber, 123 Mass. 253; In re Boyle, 9 Wis ... 264; State v. Bloom, 17 Wis. 521; Ex parte Johnson, 15 Neb ... 512, 19 N.W. 594; Trumbo v. People, 75 Ill. 565; State v ... Meehan, 45 N. J. Law, 192; State v. Vickers, 51 N. J. Law, ... ...
  • Dredla v. Baache
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • October 18, 1900
    ...orders and judgments are to be held as valid and binding as though rendered by an officer whose title was beyond dispute. Ex parte Johnson, 15 Neb. 512, 19 N. W. 594;State v. Lewis (N. C.) 12 S. E. 457, 11 L. R. A. 105; 1 Black, Judgm. § 175; 1 Freem. Judgm. § 148. It follows, from the view......
  • Dredla v. Baache
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • October 18, 1900
    ... ... officer. Hamlin v. Kassafer, 15 Ore. 456, 15 P. 778; ... Brown v. Lunt, 37 Me. 423, 428; Ex parte ... Strang, 21 Ohio St. 610; Conover v. Devlin, 15 ... How. Pr. [N.Y.] 477; Cox v. Houston & T. R. Co. 68 ... Tex. 226, 4 S.W. 455; State v ... be held as valid and binding as though rendered by an officer ... whose title was beyond dispute. Ex parte Johnson, 15 ... Neb. 512, 19 N.W. 594; State v. Lewis, 11 L.R.A ... 105; 1 Black, Judgments, sec. 175; 1 Freeman, Judgments, sec ... ...
  • Sennott v. Swan
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • April 6, 1888
    ...not being void, the right of the justice issuing the commitment to hold his office cannot be inquired into on habeas corpus. Ex parte Johnson, (Neb.) 19 N.W. 594. corpus is not the proper remedy to procure the discharge of a person arrested in a civil action on an affidavit which merely all......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT