Ex Parte Kennedy

Decision Date05 December 1945
Docket NumberNo. 23302.,23302.
Citation190 S.W.2d 825
PartiesEx parte KENNEDY.
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

Appeal from District Court, McCulloch County; A. O. Newman, Judge.

Alvin H. Kennedy was charged with murder, and from an order denying bail pending trial, he appeals.

Reversed and bail granted.

Sam McCollum, of Brady, and Gib Callaway, of Brownwood, for appellant.

Mark Callaway, Dist. Atty., and J. Edward Johnson, both of Brownwood, and Ernest S. Goens, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant, under indictment for murder, was denied bail, pending trial. The appeal is from that order.

It is the policy of this Court that in such cases the facts be not discussed at length or conclusions expressed further than to determine the one issue before us, which is whether the evidence is clear and strong, leading a well-guarded and dispassionate judgment to the conclusion that the offense has been committed, that the appellant is the guilty agent, and that he would probably receive the death penalty upon the trial of the case. Ex parte McNeely, 98 Tex.Cr.R. 598, 267 S.W. 717; Ex parte Vermillion, 102 Tex.Cr.R. 590, 280 S.W. 771; Ex parte Green, 102 Tex. Cr.R. 542, 279 S.W. 471; Ex parte Grayson, 104 Tex.Cr.R. 365, 284 S.W. 552; Ex parte Miller, 112 Tex.Cr.R. 229, 16 S.W.2d 123; Ex parte Perkins, 118 Tex. Cr.R. 178, 40 S.W.2d 123; Ex parte Coward, 145 Tex.Cr.R. 593, 170 S.W.2d 754; Ex parte Jennings, 128 Tex.Cr.R. 610, 83 S.W.2d 334; Ex parte Redding, Tex.Crim.App., 180 S.W.2d 951; Ex parte McIntosh, Tex.Crim.App., 183 S.W.2d 978.

The burden is upon the State to show the accused is not entitled to bail. Ex parte Firmin, 60 Tex.Cr.R. 368, 131 S.W. 1113; Ex parte Patterson, 81 Tex. Cr.R. 26, 193 S.W. 146; Ex parte Hill, 101 Tex.Cr.R. 312, 276 S.W. 250; Ex parte Adair, 118 Tex.Cr.R. 142, 38 S.W.2d 800; Ex parte Coward, 145 Tex.Cr.R. 593, 170 S.W.2d 754.

The appellant's wife was the sister of the deceased. Ill feeling had existed between appellant and deceased for about ten years. In August, 1943, about twenty-six months prior to the killing, a violent controversy arose between them, since which time they had not spoken to each other. Shortly after this controversy, the deceased told a deputy sheriff that if appellant did not quit butting into his business he would kill him. The deputy sheriff informed appellant thereafter that he had been told deceased would kill him if he bothered him; that he (the deputy sheriff) believed that he would carry out his threat; and that he would like for them to stay apart, as he did not want to see any trouble.

About ten days prior to the killing, the deceased purchased from his mother the farm upon which appellant and his wife had been living for a number of years. When the agreed purchase price the deceased was to pay for the farm was known, appellant offered to pay more for the farm. His offer being rejected, he and his wife offered to buy another farm owned jointly by the mother and her children; and this appears also to have been rejected. Subsequently, and on the afternoon of the day before the killing, appellant's wife met the deceased in the road near her home and undertook to get him to consent to the purchase by them of the farm last mentioned. Such request was refused and in that conversation deceased threatened to kill the appellant the first time he met him. This threat, as also the conduct of deceased on the occasion thereof, was communicated to appellant by his wife that night. The following afternoon the killing occurred when, according to appellant's testimony, deceased made a demonstration which appellant believed was to get a pistol out of the glove compartment of the truck in which he was riding with which to kill him and carry into execution the threat.

There was no witness to the killing other than the appellant. The circumstances and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Ex Parte Varnado, 24265.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • November 24, 1948
    ...27 S.W.2d 167; Ex parte Perkins, 118 Tex. Cr.R. 178, 40 S.W.2d 123; Ex parte Goode, 123 Tex.Cr.R. 492, 59 S.W.2d 841; Ex parte Kennedy, 149 Tex.Cr.R. 1, 190 S.W. 2d 825; Ex parte Suger, 149 Tex.Cr.R. 133, 192 S.W.2d It is sufficient to state the following facts generally; Both White and rel......
  • Ex Parte Merrill
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • April 23, 1947
    ...590, 280 S.W. 771; Ex parte Cantu, 135 Tex.Cr.R. 281, 117 S.W.2d 1102; Ex parte Suger, Tex.Cr.App., 192 S.W.2d 159; Ex parte Kennedy, Tex.Cr.App., 190 S.W.2d 825; Ex parte Pettis, 60 Tex.Cr.R. 288, 131 S.W. 1081. It is the general rule that in cases of rape by force where the prosecutrix is......
  • Kennedy v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • January 29, 1947
    ...brother-in-law, appellant has been condemned to life imprisonment in the State penitentiary. The bail feature of this case is reported in 190 S.W.2d 825. The questions presented for review render necessary an extended statement of the Benton Willey died in 1931 and left surviving him his wi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT