Ex parte Lewis
| Decision Date | 23 December 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 07-83-0337-CV,07-83-0337-CV |
| Citation | 663 S.W.2d 153 |
| Parties | Ex parte Dan William LEWIS, Relator. |
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Dan William Lewis, pro se.
Randall Sherrod, Dist. Atty., Canyon, for appellee.
Before REYNOLDS, C.J., and DODSON and COUNTISS, JJ.
This is an original habeas corpus proceeding. Relator Dan William Lewis was convicted of the felony offense of theft, Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 31.03 (Vernon Supp.1982), and sentenced to ten years in the penitentiary. The conviction was affirmed by this Court in an unpublished opinion, Dan William Lewis v. The State Texas, No. 07-82-0259-CR (Tex.App.--Amarillo, Aug. 19, 1983), and his petition for discretionary review is pending before the Court of Criminal Appeals. He is presently incarcerated in the Randall County Jail as a result of the conviction. By this proceeding, he contends he is being restrained because of various errors and improprieties related to his conviction and he seeks release from jail by writ of habeas corpus. We dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.
The Court of Appeals is required to determine its own jurisdiction in each case. That jurisdiction is established by various constitutional and statutory provisions, see, e.g., Tex. Const. art. 5, § 6; Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. arts. 1819, 1823, 1824, 1824a (Vernon 1964, Vernon Supp.1982); Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 4.03 (Vernon Supp.1982), and is not unlimited or absolute. Gibbs v. Melton, 354 S.W.2d 426 (Tex.Civ.App.--Dallas 1962, no writ). Prior to 1969, the predecessor of this Court, the Court of Civil Appeals, had no jurisdiction to issue writs of habeas corpus as an original matter. Crofts v. Court of Civil Appeals, 362 S.W.2d 101, 105 (Tex.1962). In 1969, the legislature enacted Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 1824a (Vernon Supp.1982) granting the Court of Civil Appeals the authority to issue original writs of habeas corpus in certain limited situations related to divorce, custody and support. The statute was amended in 1981 to apply to the Court of Appeals. The extremely limited original habeas corpus jurisdiction granted by art. 1824a cannot be construed to encompass matters not specifically covered by the statute. Ex parte Sarao, 583 S.W.2d 438 (Tex.Civ.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1979, no writ); Ex parte Rutherford, 556 S.W.2d 853 (Tex.Civ.App.--San Antonio 1977, no writ).
Thus, Relator's attempt to secure a writ of habeas corpus from this court must fail. We do not have original jurisdiction...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ex parte Shumake
...appeals is established by various constitutional and statutory provisions, but that jurisdiction is not unlimited or absolute. Ex parte Lewis, 663 S.W.2d 153, 154 (Tex.App.--Amarillo 1983, no pet.). A court of appeals is required to determine its own jurisdiction in each case. Id. Generally......
-
Lovelady v. State
...but that jurisdiction is not unlimited or absolute. Ex parte Shumake, 953 S.W.2d 842, 844 (Tex. App.-Austin 1997, no pet.); Ex parte Lewis, 663 S.W.2d 153, 154 (Tex. App.-Amarillo 1983, no pet.). Generally, we have jurisdiction in criminal cases only where there has been a judgment of convi......
-
Sanders v. State, 08-89-00040-CR
...for the first time on appeal, and we have no original jurisdiction to grant habeas corpus relief in criminal law matters. Ex parte Lewis, 663 S.W.2d 153, 154 (Tex.App.--Amarillo 1983, no writ). But, even considering this point of error, Appellant is urging that a less stringent standard for......
-
Ex parte Hawkins
...in a civil case. Stated another way, this Court does not have original habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal law matters. See Ex parte Lewis, 663 S.W.2d 153, 154 (Tex.App.--Amarillo 1983, orig. proceeding). That jurisdiction rests instead with the Court of Criminal Appeals, the District Co......