Ex parte Mobile Light & R. Co.
Decision Date | 26 June 1924 |
Docket Number | 1 Div. 322. |
Citation | 101 So. 177,211 Ala. 525 |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Parties | EX PARTE MOBILE LIGHT & R. CO. v. MOBILE LIGHT & R. CO. THOMPSON |
Petition for Certiorari to Court of Appeals.
Petition of the Mobile Light & Railroad Company for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision there rendered in the case styled Thompson v Mobile Light & Railroad Co. (Ala. App.) 101 So. 175. Writ granted.
Harry T. Smith & Caffey, of Mobile, for petitioner.
Alex T Howard, of Mobile, opposed.
The complaint is as follows:
The question presented is whether this complaint states a good cause of action as against apt demurrer.
The complaint states clearly the facts upon which liability is claimed. The test is: Would these facts, if proven, support a finding that defendant owed a duty to plaintiff to keep a general watch over the parked cars to prevent theft? Admittedly, if there was no duty in that regard, there was no negligence by nonperformance. No question arises as to legal duty growing out of a public service, such as public warehousemen and the like. The liability must rest either...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Alabama Great So. R. Co. v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co.
...123, 62 So. 542; Housing Authority of Birmingham District v. Morris, 1943, 244 Ala. 557, 14 So.2d 527; Ex parte Mobile Light & R. Co., 1924, 211 Ala. 525, 101 So. 177, 34 A.L.R. 921; Denver Union Terminal R. Co. v. Cullinan, 1922, 72 Colo. 248, 210 P. 602, 27 A.L.R. 154; Mobile & Ohio R. Co......
-
Pickett v. Matthews, 2 Div. 149.
... ... absolve the company from its common law liability for gross ... negligence. Ex parte Priester, 212 Ala. 271, 102 So. 376; ... American Union Telegraph Co. v. Daughtery, 89 Ala ... found little difficulty in sustaining such an act when ... considered in the light of changed conditions ... Moreover ... when the United States Supreme Court construes ... Restatement, §§ 574, 575; 13 Corpus Juris 491, section 437; ... Ex parte Mobile Light & R. R. Co., 211 Ala. 525, 101 So. 177, ... 34 A.L.R. 921 ... But if ... the Act ... ...
-
Goodyear Clearwater Mills v. Wheeler
... ... bailee, and his duties of reasonable care spring out of his ... possession.' Thompson v. Mobile Light & R. Co., 211 ... Ala. 525, 101 So. 177(3), 34 A.L.R. 921 ... 6 ... ...
-
Mills v. Wheeler
...of bailment is possession in the bailee, and his duties of reasonable care spring out of his possession." Thompson v. Mobile Light & R. Co., 211 Ala. 525, 101 So. 177(3), 34 A.L.R. 921. 6. "Delivery under which the bailee acquires an independent and temporarily exclusive possession is essen......