Ex parte Morris
Citation | 465 So.2d 1180 |
Parties | 24 Ed. Law Rep. 587 Ex parte Betty MORRIS. (Re: Betty Morris v. State of Alabama). 83-1355. |
Decision Date | 11 January 1985 |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Paul M. Harden, Monroeville, for petitioner.
Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., and Helen P. Nelson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
We granted certiorari on the single issue of whether the trial judge's jury instructions amounted to coercion of a verdict.
Petitioner Morris was indicted, by separate indictments, on several charges of embezzlement. After trial on the first indictment, she was acquitted. After a jury trial on the second indictment, however, she was found guilty and sentenced to two years in the state penitentiary. That judgment was affirmed by the Court of Criminal Appeals, Morris v. State, 465 So.2d 1173 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), which found, specifically, that the trial court had not coerced a verdict from the jury.
The events upon which Petitioner bases her claim that the trial court coerced the jury's verdict are as follows:
After a jury trial before the Honorable Robert E.L. Key, Judge of the Circuit Court of Conecuh County, Alabama, the jury retired to begin deliberations on Wednesday, September 29, 1982, at 10:00 A.M. The trial judge, in the presence of the Petitioner, Petitioner's attorney, and the District attorney, addressed the jury:
During that meeting, a juror asked the following question:
Thereafter, the jurors retired to the jury room for further deliberations. At 3:35 P.M. the jury asked to meet with the court again, and the following transpired:
At 5:43 P.M. the jury had not reached a verdict and Judge Key addressed the jurors:
After the jurors had left the courtroom, counsel for Petitioner moved for a mistrial on the ground that the jury was deadlocked. Judge Key replied:
The next morning, Thursday, September 30, 1982, at 9:23 A.M., the following took place:
At this point, counsel for Petitioner again moved for a mistrial, stating as his grounds that the foregoing amounted to coercion. The motion was overruled and the jury retired again for further deliberations. The trial transcript reveals that "[a]t 11:20 A.M. the jury having reported that they had arrived at a verdict, Honorable James B. Watson, District Judge and Special Circuit Judge so designated by Judge Key to receive the verdict, came to Evergreen, the jury was called to the courtroom and in the presence of the defendant, her attorney and the district attorney [reported its verdict of guilty]." Each juror answered in the affirmative Judge Watson's question, "Is this your verdict?" Counsel for Petitioner renewed his motion for mistrial.
Petitioner urges this Court to take the initiative to "hereby overrule those controlling cases in Alabama which allow the use of the 'Allen charge.' " This we refuse to do. The admonitions of this charge are as valid today as when Allen was decided in 1896:
Allen v. United States, 164 U.S. 492, 501, 17 S.Ct. 154, 157, 41 L.Ed. 528 (1896).
Indeed, "[i]t is quite clear that under Alabama law a trial judge may urge a jury to resume deliberations and cultivate a spirit...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
McWhorter v. State
... ... "` Ex parte Bankhead, 585 So.2d 112, 121 (Ala.1991) .'" ... " Smith v. State, 646 So.2d 704, 712-13 (Ala.Cr.App.1994) ." ... Smith v ... Whether an ` Allen Charge' is coercive must be evaluated in the `whole context' of the case. Ex parte Morris, 465 So.2d 1180, 1183 (Ala. 1985) ... In this case, the trial judge did not set any deadline for reaching a verdict. See Adair v. State, 641 So.2d ... ...
-
Tomlin v. State
... ... The court found that the argument implied that the trial court believed that there was sufficient evidence to convict Tomlin. See Ex parte Tomlin, 540 So.2d 668 (Ala.1988) ... In 1990, Tomlin was retried on the capital charges and again convicted. On appeal, this ... , the burden of proving this issue, from the start, is on the defendant ... " 30 Am. Jur.2d Evidence § 1160 (1967).' Morris v. State, 465 So.2d 1173, 1177 (Ala.Cr. App.1984), reversed on other grounds, 465 So.2d 1180 (Ala.1985) ." ... Spears, 647 ... ...
-
McWhorter v. Dunn
... ... Crim. App. 1999). On August 11, 2000, the Alabama Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals. Ex parte McWhorter , 781 So. 2d 330 (Ala. 2000). The United States Supreme Court denied McWhorter's petition for a writ of certiorari on April 16, 2001 ... , where individual claims of error or prejudice are without merit, a cumulative error claim must fail because "we have nothing to accumulate." Morris v ... Sec'y , Dep't ... of Corr ., 677 F.3d 1117, 1132 (11th Cir. 2012). Thus, the court must address McWhorter's ineffective assistance of counsel ... ...
-
Jennings v. State
... ... State, 348 So.2d 1101, 1104 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, Ex parte Williams, 348 So.2d 1105 (Ala.1977). See also Jones v. State, 415 So.2d 1233, 1236 (Ala.Cr.App.1982)." Johnson v. State, supra, at 1328 ... State, 424 So.2d 665 (Ala.Cr.App.1982)." (Emphasis in Chesson.) ... Morris v. State, 465 So.2d 1173, 1178 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), reversed on other grounds, Ex parte Morris, 465 So.2d 1180 (Ala.1985) ... "In ... ...