Ex parte Rogers
| Decision Date | 03 April 1963 |
| Docket Number | No. 35748,35748 |
| Citation | 366 S.W.2d 559 |
| Parties | Ex parte Ben H. ROGERS. |
| Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Ben H. Rogers, pro se.
Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.
The relator is confined in the penitentiary under a conviction in Cause No. 23345 in Criminal District Court of Jefferson County. The indictment, drawn under Art. 725c Vernon's Ann.P.C., alleged that he was 'addicted to the use of narcotic drugs', he not being a person who had a medical need for narcotic drugs and not being a person who obtains narcotic drugs required for such medical need in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and of the United States.
Upon a plea of guilty to said indictment, relator was assessed a term of 5 years. Probation was granted but thereafter revoked, and the term of punishment was reduced to 4 years.
The statute under which this prosecution was had, insofar as it makes it a crime for a person to be addicted to the use of narcotic cotic drugs, is invalid. Salas v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 365 S.W.2d 174; Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660, 82 S.Ct. 1417, 8 L.Ed.2d 758.
The statute being void, the conviction cannot stand.
We observe, also, that the punishment assessed against the relator is in excess of the maximum punishment provided for violation of Art. 725c V. A. P. C., which is 3 years.
The writ of habeas corpus is granted and the relator is ordered discharged from further restraint under the conviction above described.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Scott v. Texas State Board of Medical Examiners
...Tex. 479, 322 S.W.2d 609 (1959).6 Acts 1939, Ch. 3, p. 352.7 Acts 1953, Ch. 426, p. 1029.8 Held invalid as to drug addiction in Ex Parte Rogers, 366 S.W.2d 559. ...
-
Casias v. State
...8 L.Ed.2d 758. See also Salas v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 365 S.W.2d 174, cert. dism. 375 U.S. 15, 84 S.Ct. 96, 11 L.Ed.2d 45; Ex parte Rogers, Tex.Cr.App., 366 S.W.2d 559; Article 725c, Vernon's Further, an intent to commit a crime (i.e., the possession of heroin) in absence of an overt act doe......
-
Corpus v. State, 43367
...case. Cf. Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660, 82 S.Ct. 1417, 8 L.Ed.2d 758; Salas v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 365 S.W.2d 174; Ex parte Rogers, Tex.Cr.App., 366 S.W.2d 559. And in Feather v. State, 169 Tex.Cr.R. 334, 333 S.W.2d 851, this court held a qualified officer may state that he observed......
-
Martinez v. State, 36102
...and held that part of Art. 725c Vernon's Ann.P.C. which attempted to make it a crime to be an addict unconstitutional. See Ex parte Rogers, Tex.Cr.App., 366 S.W.2d 559; Salas v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 365 S.W.2d The cases cited furnish no authority for striking down the statute which provides ......