Ex Parte Smith

Decision Date25 November 1901
Citation79 Miss. 373,30 So. 710
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
PartiesEX PARTE BUD SMITH

October 1901

FROM the circuit court of Washington county. HON. FRANK E. LARKIN Judge.

The case was a habeas corpus proceeding instituted by Bud Smith which was tried in the circuit court and the writ there denied. Smith appealed to the supreme court. The opinion fully states the case.

Affirmed.

C. J. Jones, for the appellant.

The appellant makes but one point. He was charged with a misdemeanor, and, under the facts, could have been guilty only as charged. The justice of the peace ought to have tried him upon the charge preferred, and had no power in law to refuse to try him, or to bind him over to the circuit court. Think of the great injustice to appellant that was done. If he had been tried and convicted, he could only have been punished by fine and imprisoment, and, if no appeal were prosecuted, he could have begun the service of his sentence at once. As it is, being unable to give the bond required, appellant is confined in jail from the date of his commitment until the meeting of the circuit court, before trial, and is then, if convicted in that court, subject to as great a sentence as he would have been had he been promptly tried by the justice of the peace. Appellant was entitled to a speedy trial. This was denied. He has been imprisoned before trial, and is liable to suffer two penalties--two terms of imprisonment--for the same offense.

Monroe McClurg, attorney-general, contra.

The action of the magistrate was authorized by law. Code 1892, § 2424. In this case it was wise. Appellant cannot be discharged. Burke's case, 58 Miss. 50; Ex parte Grubbs, ante, 358.

OPINION

TERRAL, J.

Bud Smith, for the commission of an aggravated assault and battery, was, by a justice of the peace of Washington county, bound over to the circuit court in the sum of $ 500, and, failing to give said bond, he was given into the custody of the sheriff of said county. He brings this suit of habeas corpus, and asks that his case be remanded to the justice of the peace for trial, and, if that prayer be not granted, that his bail bond be reduced.

The perfect propriety of the action of the justice of the peace will be best shown by a relation of the facts. Bud Smith was prosecuted before Justice of the Peace Basket upon an affidavit charging that Smith, in said county, on the twenty-first day of September, 1901, "did commit...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Wall v. Quin
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 21 November 1927
    ... ... State, ... 129 Miss. 469, 92 So. 584; Butler v. State, 129 ... Miss. 778; 93 So. 3; State v. Patterson, 130 Miss ... 680, 95 So. 96; Smith v. State, 133 Miss. 730, 98 ... So. 344; Owens v. State, 133 Miss. 753, 98 So. 233; ... Strangi v. State, 134 Miss. 31, 98 So. 340; ... Taylor v ... ...
  • Knight v. Johns
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 2 November 1931
    ...There were no grounds for a habeas corpus proceeding. Section 1914, Code 1930; Ex parte Grubbs, 79 Miss. 358, 30 So. 708; Ex parte Smith, 79 Miss. 373, 30 So. 710. courts of equity concern themselves only with matters of property and with the maintenance of civil rights and do not interfere......
  • Atkinson v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 14 May 1923
    ... ... took place. See 55 Washington, 588, 104, P. 814; Green v ... State, 66 Ala. 44, et seq ... In Ex ... Parte Slater, 72 Mo. 102, a very similar question was raised ... The offense was committed in one county, and the indictment ... returned in another ... citizen. State, v. Paule, 12 Wis. 537 ... This ... same question was decided in the case of Smith v ... Florida, 42 Fla. 605, where the court sustained a ... similar statute to the one in question. State v ... Paule, 12 Wis. 537; ... ...
  • Ex parte Burden
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 16 December 1907
    ... ... The writ of ... habeas corpus furnishes no redress for the matters here ... complained of. Freem. on Judgments, ch. 29; Church on Hab ... Corp., ch. 24; Emanuel v. State, 36 Miss. 627." Ex parte ... Grubbs, 79 Miss. 358, 30 So. 708; Ex parte Smith, 79 Miss ... 373, 30 So. 110; Ex parte Burke, 58 Miss. 50 ... I call ... the special attention of the court to the exhaustive ... treatment of this question as contained in 15 Am. & Eng ... Ency. Law (2d ed.) 170, 1-3 et seq. On these pages the whole ... question is treated with ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT