Ex parte State ex rel. Ingram Land Co.
Citation | 93 So. 820,208 Ala. 28 |
Decision Date | 22 June 1922 |
Docket Number | 5 Div. 804. |
Parties | EX PARTE STATE EX REL. INGRAM LAND CO. |
Court | Supreme Court of Alabama |
Petition of the State of Alabama, on the relation of the Ingram Land Company for a writ of mandamus to Hon. S. L. Brewer, Judge of the Fifth Judicial Circuit, requiring him to enter an order changing the venue of an action pending in the circuit court of Tallapoosa county, wherein the Ingram Land Company is the plaintiff and Nora E. Miller is the defendant. Writ denied.
Black & Harris, of Birmingham, for petitioner.
James W. Strother, of Dadeville, for respondent.
The petition was for change of venue in a civil case. The prayer thereof was for writ of mandamus directing the presiding judge of the circuit embracing the county of Tallapoosa "to enter an order changing the venue in" the pending case of Ingram Land Company, a partnership, against Nora E. Miller, "and transferring it for trial to some other than Tallapoosa county Ala."
After a careful examination of the petition, return and answer of the judge, and the affidavits and counter affidavits offered, we perceive no arbitrary exercise or capricious abuse of discretion in refusing to order a change of venue. No good purpose would be subserved by a detailed recital of pleadings, or of the contents of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Woodward Iron Co. v. Vines
... ... Co. v. Bradford, 206 Ala. 447, 90 So. 803; Ex parte ... Jagger Coal Co., 211 Ala. 11, 99 So. 99; Ex parte ... exercise. Henry v. State ex rel. Welch, 200 Ala ... 475, 76 So. 417. If, however, ... Cleveland, 76 Ala ... 321; Ex parte State ex rel. Ingram Land Co., 208 Ala. 28, 93 ... So. 820; Hagan v. State ex ... ...
-
Barnes v. State ex rel. Ferguson, 1 Div. 23
...Ex parte Morrow, 259 Ala. 250, 66 So.2d 130; Williams v. Board of Dental Examiners, 222 Ala. 411, 133 So. 11; Ex parte State ex rel. Ingram Land Co., 208 Ala. 28, 93 So. 820. We perceive that the Board having substantial evidence before it to deny appellee licensure, did not abuse discretio......
-
International Union, United Auto., Aircraft and Agr. Implement Workers of America (UAW-CIO) v. Palmer
...in a civil case is at the sound discretion of the trial court. Ex parte Morrow, 259 Ala. 250, 66 So.2d 130; Ex parte State ex rel. Ingram Land Co., 208 Ala. 28, 93 So. 820; and such rulings as a rule are not subject to review on appeal from a final judgment in the cause. Mazer v. Brown, 259......
-
State ex rel. Garton v. Fulton
... ... to the views as expressed by other tribunals, we find the ... case of Ex parte Roe, 234 U.S. 70, 58 L.Ed. 1217, 34 ... S.Ct. 722, wherein an action had been removed from the ... ...