Ex parte Stephens

Decision Date24 March 1965
Docket NumberNo. 38150,38150
Citation388 S.W.2d 199
PartiesEx parte Olen STEPHENS.
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

Daugherty, Bruner & Lastelick, by Fred Bruner, Dallas, Leon Moses, McKinney, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

McDONALD, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant bail, after indictment in two cases for murder with malice.

The indictments charged that appellant did voluntarily and with malice aforethought kill Willie B. Johnson and Michael Charles Blackwell by shooting them with a gun.

The evidence is sufficient to justify a finding by the trial judge that the appellant shot and killed the deceaseds, both of whom were unarmed, without any legal justification or excuse. The refusal to grant him bail is justified under the record. Ex Parte Black, 157 Tex.Cr.R. 467, 250 S.W.2d 224; Ex Parte Williams, Tex.Cr.App., 370 S.W.2d 883.

The judgment of the trial court denying bail is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Ex parte Krueger
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • June 16, 1965
    ...would take him and show him where the body was', they then went to the place directed by appellant and found the body. In Ex Parte Stephens, Tex.Cr.App., 388 S.W.2d 199, (the writer being the author of that opinion and not stating the facts in detail, for which I assume responsibility) the ......
  • Carter v. State, 39828
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • November 2, 1966
    ...v. Beto, Fifth Circuit of Appeals, 341 F.2d 96; Stephens v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 377 S.W.2d 189 (cited in Crocker, supra), Ex parte Stephens, Tex.Cr.App., 388 S.W.2d 199, cert. denied, Stephens v. Texas, 380 U.S. 980, 85 S.Ct. 1344, 14 L.Ed.2d The other contention is that the introduction in......
  • Matula v. State, 38197
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • May 19, 1965
    ...385 S.W.2d 392, and the many cases there cited. See, also: Breen v. Beto, Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, 341 F.2d 96; Ex parte Stephens, Tex.Cr.App., 388 S.W.2d 199, cer. denied, Stephens v. Texas, 85 S.Ct. We have carefully examined appellant's informal bills of exception and perceive no ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT