Ex parte Townsley, A-6037
| Decision Date | 12 December 1956 |
| Docket Number | No. A-6037,A-6037 |
| Parties | Ex parte J. H. TOWNSLEY. |
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Tom C. McMurray, Decatur, for petitioner.
H. G. Woodruff, Decatur, for respondent.
This is an original habeas corpus proceeding. Relator, J. H. Townsley, has been adjudged in contempt by the 43rd District Court of Wise County for failure to make payments for the support of his minor child as required by the divorce judgment entered by said Court on August 28, 1951. The contempt decree fixed the punishment at seventy-two hours in jail, and directed that relator continue in jail until he purged himself by paying the $2,400 found to be in arrears. We have concluded that relator must be discharged.
Relator was ordered by the divorce decree to make child support payments of $40 per month, beginning September 1, 1951, and only one such payment has been made. The record contains evidence which supports the conclusion that he was able to pay one or more of the delinquent installments as they accrued, and he was therefore subject to the punishment authorized by Art. 1911, Vernon's Ann.Tex.Civ.Stat., even though at the time of the hearing he may have been unable to pay the full amount in arrears. Ex parte De Wees, 146 Tex. 564, 210 S.W.2d 145. It appears, however, that relator remained in jail for more than three days before being released on bail by order of this Court, and we are concerned only with the power of the trial court to order that he be confined until the $2,400 is paid.
The evidence bearing upon relator's ability to pay at the time of the contempt hearing is not controverted. Shortly before the divorce was granted, he failed in the monument business and was adjudged a bankrupt and discharged. He remarried soon after the divorce and moved to New Mexico, where an automobile business was established with funds borrowed from his mother and from other sources. This business venture also failed, and relator and his wife then lived and worked for a time in Dallas, but eventually moved to Wise County and made their home with his mother. After returning to Wise County, relator made a race for State Representative but was defeated, and his efforts to find work in Decatur, Dallas and Fort Worth have been unsuccessful. The wife is employed in her father's grocery store, but her suit against relator for divorce is pending.
At the time of the contempt hearing, relator was unemployed and physically unable to do manual...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ex parte Ramzy, B--498
...impossible. Ex parte Helms, 152 Tex. 480, 259 S.W.2d 184 (1953); Ex parte White, 154 Tex. 126, 274 S.W.2d 542 (1955); Ex parte Townsley, 156 Tex. 402, 297 S.W.2d 111 (1956), Ex parte Rohleder, 424 S.W.2d 891 (Tex.Sup.1967). A district court, however, is vested with plenary power to modify o......
- Manhattan Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Melton
-
Ex parte Papageorgiou
...the criminal contempt judgment is not void. Ex parte Raymer, 644 S.W.2d 889 (Tex.App.--Amarillo 1982, no writ); see Ex parte Townsley, 156 Tex. 402, 297 S.W.2d 111 (1956). For this court to hold the civil portion of the order invalid, relator must conclusively establish that he is unable to......
-
Ex parte Cox
...and psychologically unable to comply with the order. Ex parte Kollenborn, 154 Tex. 223, 276 S.W.2d 251 (1955), and Ex parte Townsley, 156 Tex. 402, 297 S.W.2d 111 (1956), are cited to support this point. In Kollenborn the evidence to determine couldn't weigh the evidence to determine whethe......