Ex Parte Turner.
Decision Date | 15 December 1909 |
Citation | 151 N.C. 474,66 S.E. 431 |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | Ex parte TURNER. |
Habeas Corpus (§ 99*)—Custody and Control of Child.
The father has the paramount right to the control and custody of his child, but the court may order the child into the custody of some person other than the father when it seems for the best interest of the child, and where the evidence satisfies the judge that both the father and the mother, who are living apart, are of such a character that the interests of the child are best served by giving a third person the custody, the court can make such an order with provisions therein for the child to spend part of its vacation with each parent and restrictions preventing the removal of the child from the jurisdiction of the court.
[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Habeas Corpus, Cent. Dig. § 84; Dec. Dig. § 99;* Parent and Child, Cent. Dig. §§ 4-32.]
Appeal from Superior Court, Buncombe County; J. S. Adams, Judge.
Elizabeth Turner applies for a writ of habeas corpus for the possession and custody of Constance E. Turner, a child. From a decree placing the child in the custody of the superintendent of an industrial school, Claudia Turner appeals. Modified and affirmed.
This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus which was issued on the petition of Elizabeth Turner for the possession and custody of Constance Elizabeth Turner, hereinafter designated as Constance, and on the hearing of said petition James B. Turner, father of Constance, came in and asked that he be made one of the petitioners with the original petitioner, Elizabeth Turner, which was granted. After considering all of the evidence adduced by the petitioners, Elizabeth Turner, the mother of Constance, the judge found the following facts:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Spence v. Durham
...and to the determination therein of the fitness of claimants and the best interest of children. See: In Re Kimel, supra; In Re Turner, 151 N.C. 474, 479, 66 S.E. 431; Lee, North Carolina Family Law, § 224; McClintock, Handbook on the Principles of Equity, 2d Ed., § 54; Nelson, Divorce and A......
-
Griffith v. Griffith, 675
...Court (1) approved rulings below in declining to award custody to nonresident applicants or (2) disapproved rulings contra. In re Turner, 151 N.C. 474, 66 S.E. 431; Walker v. Walker, 224 N.C. 751, 32 S.E.2d 318; In re De Ford, 226 N.C. 189, 37 S.E.2d 516; Gafford v. Phelps, 235 N.C. 218, 69......
-
Gafford v. Phelps
...removed from the State by one to whom unqualified custody has not been awarded. Harris v. Harris, 115 N.C. 587, 20 S.E. 187; In re Turner, 151 N.C. 474, 66 S.E. 431; Page v. Page, 116 N.C. 90, 81 S.E. 1060; Page v. Page, 167 N.C. 350, 83 S.E. 627; Walker v. Walker, 224 N.C. 751, 32 S.E.2d 3......
- North Carolina Corp. Comm'n v. Southern Ry. Co