Ex parte Tuscaloosa County, 86-1653
Decision Date | 12 February 1988 |
Docket Number | No. 86-1653,86-1653 |
Citation | 522 So.2d 782 |
Parties | Ex parte TUSCALOOSA COUNTY, Alabama. (Re TUSCALOOSA COUNTY v. INA/AETNA INSURANCE CO.). |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Barry L. Mullins of Lee, Barrett, Mullins, Smith & Smithart, Tuscaloosa, for petitioner.
Wilbor J. Hust, Jr. of Zeanah, Hust & Summerford, Tuscaloosa, for respondent.
We granted the petitioner's request to review the Court of Civil Appeals' holding that the "failure to file suit within the time specified by the applicable statute of limitations bars the injured employee's right to sue not only for [workmen's] compensation but also for [accrued medical expenses]." 1 The Court of Civil Appeals, affirming the insurer's summary judgment, reasoned as follows:
We reverse and remand.
We hold that the injured employee's right to sue for accrued medical expenses, as authorized by Ala. Code 1975, § 25-5-77, is totally independent of the employee's right to sue for workmen's compensation benefits; thus, the commencement of an employee's action, whether for compensation benefits or for medical expenses, or for both, within one year (now two years) is not a condition precedent to the employee's right to sue for accrued medical expenses, whether such expenses are incurred during the period of limitations for compensation benefits or after the expiration of such period. (As the Court of Civil Appeals' opinion indicates, the claim for medical expenses was filed more than one year after the last payment of compensation benefits, but within one year after the medical expenses here claimed were incurred by the injured employee.)
Primarily, our holding is predicated on Ala. Code 1975, §§ 25-5-77 and 25-5-80. Pursuant to § 25-5-77, an employer (or its insurer), without limitations of time, is liable for all reasonably necessary medical expenses incurred as the result of an employee's work-related injury. Likewise, § 25-5-80--the Code section that prescribes the only period of limitations applicable to the instant employee's injury--applies only to compensation benefits, not to medical expenses. See § 25-5-1(1). 2 Thus the absence of any time limitations on the employer's liability for future medical expenses and the absence of any period of limitations on the injured employee's right to sue for accrued medical expenses combine to insure the injured employee's right to judicially enforce payment of future medical expenses, once such expenses have accrued, as contemplated by § 25-5-77.
Moreover, the Workmen's Compensation Act does not prescribe, as a condition precedent to the right to sue for accrued medical expenses, that the injured employee be entitled to weekly compensation benefits. Both of the cases cited for the contrary view by the Court of Civil Appeals ( B.F. Goodrich v....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Barnes v. Ala. Workmen's Comp. Self-Insurer's Guaranty Ass'n, Inc. (In re Warrior Met Coal, Inc.)
... 294 So.3d 780 EX PARTE WARRIOR MET COAL, INC. (In re: Steve Barnes v. Alabama Workmen's ... Ford and Burke M. Spree of King Simmons Ford & Spree, P.C., Tuscaloosa, for respondent. EDWARDS, Judge. Steve Barnes filed a complaint in the ... of any medical expenses under the Act, citing Ex parte Tuscaloosa County , 522 So. 2d 782 (Ala. 1988). See WMC's petition at note 9. In Ex ... ...
-
Robert Burton & Associates, Ltd v. Morris
... ... In Ex parte Tuscaloosa County, 522 So.2d 782, 784 (Ala.1988), the supreme court held ... ...
-
Ex Parte Morris
... ... trial court as to its award of medical benefits under the Alabama Act, citing Ex parte Tuscaloosa County, 522 So.2d 782, 784 (Ala.1988), which held that "a claim [for medical benefits under the ... ...
-
Ex parte Americold Compressors Co.
... ... The Defendant at the time of the injury was operating a business in Cullman County and the Plaintiff was working for the Defendant and the workmen's compensation law of this state ... At the time of this final order, our courts followed Davis v. City of Tuscaloosa, 494 So.2d 643 (Ala.Civ.App.1986), in regard to future medical expenses. In that case the Court of ... ...