Ex parte Watkins, 26475

Citation159 Tex.Crim. 14,259 S.W.2d 215
Decision Date03 June 1953
Docket NumberNo. 26475,26475
PartiesEx parte WATKINS.
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

Charles W. Tessmer, Dallas, for appellant.

Henry Wade, Crim. Dist. Atty., and George P. Blackburn, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, Wesley Dice, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

This is an extradition case. The Governor of this State issued his executive warrant based upon the requisition and supporting papers of the Acting Governor of the State of Oklahoma, authorizing the arrest, delivery, and return of appellant to the State of Oklahoma, to answer a charge of deserting and abandoning minor children.

After arrest upon said warrant, appellant sought his discharge therefrom by writ of habeas corpus before the Judge of the Criminal District Court of Dallas County.

After hearing, the relief prayed for was denied and appellant was, by order of the court, remanded to the custody of the arresting officer, from which he gave notice of appeal.

The executive warrant of the Governor of this State and the requisition and all accompanying papers were introduced in evidence. This made out a prima facie case that the accused is a fugitive from justice and is subject to extradition.

The criminal complaint accompanying the requisition was made and filed on July 9, 1951, and is as follows, to-wit:

'* * * that before the filing of this complaint, and on or about the 12th day of November, 1950, within the County of Osage, State of Oklahoma: the defendant, James Thomas Watkins then and there being, did then and there wrongfully, wilfully, unlawfully, and feloniously desert and abandon his minor children, James Thomas Watkins, Jr., age 4, Billy Don, age 3, Dickey Ray, age 2, and Vicki Jo, age 5 months, while said children were in destitute and necessitous circumstances, and without just cause or excuse and has since said date wrongfully, wilfully and unlawfully failed, neglected and refused to support, maintain, and provide for said minor children, contrary to the form of the statute in such cases made and provided and against the peace and dignity of the State.'

By Bill of Exception No. 1 appellant contends that he should be discharged upon the ground that the complaint upon which the Oklahoma demand is predicated is void.

Appellant bases his contention upon the ground that the facts set out in the affidavit of Marjorie Watkins, the mother of the children, which affidavit accompanied the requisition of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Martz, In re
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • December 21, 1960
    ...U.S. 840, 97 L.Ed. 653; Ex parte Hagan, 295 Mo. 435, 245 S.W. 336; Ex parte Combs, 132 Tex.Cr.R. 500, 105 S.W.2d 1096; Ex parte Watkins, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 14, 259 S.W.2d 215; State ex rel. Arnold v. Justus, 84 Minn. 237, 87 N.W. 770, 55 L.R.A. 325; Morrison v. Dwyer, 143 Iowa 502, 121 N.W. 1064......
  • Wright v. State, 04-86-00260-CR
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • September 30, 1986
    ...the accused was charged with an extraditable offense under the laws of the demanding state, Ex parte Watkins, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 14, 259 S.W.2d 215, 216 (Tex.Crim.App.1953); the accused was in the demanding state at the time of the offense, Ex parte Trisler, 605 S.W.2d 619, 620 (Tex.Crim.App.198......
  • Reynolds v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • January 5, 1955
    ...and Information, k87(2) and authorities there cited. One of the latest expressions attesting the rule is that of Ex parte Watkins, Tex.Cr.App., 259 S.W.2d 215. Applying the rule just stated here, a conviction could have been obtained under Count No. 1, upon facts showing that the offense oc......
  • Ex parte Wiggins
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • March 21, 1956
    ...in evidence and makes out a prima facie case authorizing his return. Ex parte Guinn, Tex.Cr.App., 284 S.W.2d 721; Ex parte Watkins, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 14, 259 S.W.2d 215; and Ex parte Wagner, 158 Tex.Cr.R. 444, 256 S.W.2d No issue was made at the hearing as to the appellant's identity as being t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT