Ex parte West
| Decision Date | 05 March 2004 |
| Citation | 890 So.2d 210 |
| Parties | Ex parte Geoffrey Todd WEST. (In re Geoffrey Todd West v. State of Alabama). |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Hilda Trapp Smith, Florence; and Charles H. Pullen, Huntsville, for petitioner.
William H. Pryor, Jr., atty. gen.; Nathan A. Forrester, deputy atty. gen.; and Michael B. Billingsley and Jeremy W. McIntire, asst. attys. gen., for respondent.
On June 6, 1999, Geoffrey Todd West was convicted of capital murder, a violation of § 13A-5-40(a)(2), Ala.Code 1975. The jury recommended by a vote of 10-2 that West be sentenced to death. On July 7, 1999, the trial court sentenced West to death. West appealed his sentence and conviction. On June 30, 2000, the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed West's conviction and sentence. West v. State, 793 So.2d 870 (Ala.Crim.App.2000). On February 23, 2001, this Court denied West's petition for the writ of certiorari. The Supreme Court of the United States denied West's petition for certiorari review. West v. Alabama, 534 U.S. 849, 122 S.Ct. 116, 151 L.Ed.2d 72 (2001). On February 23, 2001, the Court of Criminal Appeals issued a certificate of judgment.
On September 6, 2002, West petitioned for postconviction relief pursuant to Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P. The State moved to dismiss West's petition, because, the State argued, West's petition was untimely pursuant to Rule 32.2(c), Ala. R.Crim. P. The trial court summarily dismissed his petition. West appealed to the Court of Criminal Appeals. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the trial court's dismissal of West's Rule 32 petition, finding that West's petition was precluded by the one-year limitations period in Rule 32.2(c), Ala. R.Crim. P., as amended. West v. State, 890 So.2d 205 (Ala.Crim.App.2003). On November 21, 2003, the Court of Criminal Appeals overruled West's application for a rehearing. West then petitioned this Court for certiorari review. We hereby suspend the provisions of Rule 39(g) and (h), Ala. R.App. P., allowing the respondent to file a brief, and we summarily grant the writ.
This Court recently clarified our March 22, 2002, order amending Rule 32.2(c), Ala. R.Crim. P. See Ex parte Gardner, [Ms. 1030309, Jan. 27, 2004] ___ So.2d ___ (Ala.2004). In Gardner, this Court reasoned that "[b]ecause [the] triggering date occurred before July 31, 2001, [the petitioner] had two years from his triggering date in which to file his postconviction petition" and held that the petition was timely. Like Gardner, West had two years from his triggering date, February 23, 2001, within which to file his petition for postconviction relief. Thus, West's petition filed on September...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
West v. Allen
...granted the writ and “suspend[ed] the provisions of Rule 39(g) and (h), Ala. R.App. P., allowing [West] to file a brief.” Ex parte West, 890 So.2d 210 (Ala.2004). After finding that West's Rule 32 petition was timely filed, the Alabama Supreme Court remanded the case to be considered in the......
-
West v. State
...appellee. On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court BASCHAB, Judge. In accordance with the Alabama Supreme Court's opinion in Ex parte West, 890 So.2d 210 (Ala.2004), we reverse the circuit court's judgment and remand this case to the circuit court for further proceedings that are consistent......