Ex parte Williamson
Decision Date | 29 October 2004 |
Citation | 907 So.2d 407 |
Parties | Ex parte Donald E. WILLIAMSON and Alabama Department of Public Health. (In re Donald E. Williamson and Alabama Department of Public Health v. Wynnwood Personal Care Home I). |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
William H. Pryor, Jr., and Troy King, attys. gen., Nathan A. Forrester, deputy atty. gen., Scott L. Rouse, asst. atty. gen., and Patricia E. Ivie, asst. atty. gen., Alabama Department of Public Safety, for petitioners.
Algert S. Agricola, Jr., of Slaton & O'Connor, P.C., Montgomery, for respondent.
Albert L. Jordan and Michael L. Jackson of Wallace, Jordan, Ratliff & Brandt, L.L.C., Birmingham, for amicus curiae Assisted Living Association of Alabama, Inc., in support of the respondent.
Donald E. Williamson, the health officer for the Alabama Department of Public Health ("the Department"), petitioned this Court for a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Civil Appeals' no-opinion affirmance of the Coffee Circuit Court's judgment reversing the Department's revocation of the license of Wynnwood Personal Care Home I ("Wynnwood") to operate as an assisted-living facility. Williamson v. Wynnwood Personal Care Home I (No. 2020365, October 3, 2003), 898 So.2d 925 (Ala.Civ.App.2003)(table). We granted the petition on February 9, 2004, and we reverse and remand.
This case began when the Department, by letter dated September 28, 2000, notified Dottie Cummings, the administrator at Wynnwood, that it proposed revoking Wynnwood's license to operate as an assisted-living facility. Williamson appointed a private attorney to serve as hearing officer in the matter, and an evidentiary hearing was conducted on November 2 and 3, 2000. On January 16, 2001, the hearing officer entered a written opinion discussing in detail the testimonial and documentary evidence presented at the hearing. In pertinent part, the opinion of the hearing officer stated:
The hearing officer's recommendations and the complete administrative record were subsequently submitted to Williamson. On February 12, 2001, Williamson entered an order essentially adopting the findings of the hearing officer and revoking Wynnwood's license. Wynnwood filed a notice of appeal with the Department on February 16, 2001, and, on February 21, 2001, filed a petition in the Coffee Circuit Court for review of the license-revocation order, pursuant to Ala.Code 1975, § 41-22-20. Wynnwood also filed a motion for a stay of the revocation order, which the circuit court granted. The Department subsequently sought expedited judicial review on the ground that an inspection of Wynnwood conducted on February 20, 2001, showed that the dangerous conditions that supported the license-revocation order continued to exist. The circuit court did not rule on the motion seeking an expedited review; it held oral argument on the matter on February 13, 2002. The circuit court required additional briefing and proposed orders from the parties, but it received no new evidence. On December 16, 2002, the circuit court entered a 56-page order, which, the Department contends, was a copy of the proposed order submitted by Wynnwood,1 followed by a four-page "Addendum and Brief of the Court"; the order reversed the Department's revocation of Wynnwood's license. In pertinent part, the circuit court's "Addendum and Brief of the Court" stated:
(Emphasis and capitalization by the circuit court.)
The Department appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals, which affirmed the trial court's judgment without opinion, citing State Health Planning...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Black Eagle Minerals, LLC v. Ala. Dep't of Revenue
...instead on its constitutional arguments. Accordingly, the trial court could not have considered that argument. See Ex parte Williamson, 907 So. 2d 407, 416 (Ala. 2004) (quoting Joyner v. City of Bayou La Batre, 572 So. 2d 492, 493 (Ala. Civ. App. 1990) ) ("In a review of an administrative a......
-
Se Environmental Infrastructures v. Rivers
...Autrey, 836 So.2d 804, 805 (Ala.2002) (quoting Fleetwood Enters., Inc. v. Hutcheson, 791 So.2d 920, 923 (Ala.2000))." Ex parte Williamson, 907 So.2d 407, 414-15 (Ala.2004). Geral Moss, who worked for the joint venture, testified that he arrived at the job site as the ambulance was transport......
-
Baldwin County Elec. Corp. v. Fairhope
...ground of objection, if the specific ground was not apparent from the context." Rule 103, Ala. R. Evid. See also Ex parte Williamson, 907 So.2d 407, 416 (Ala.2004) ("`"It is a generally accepted principle, as set forth in the Alabama Rules of Evidence, that a party against whom inadmissible......
-
Ala. Bd. of Examiners in Psychology v. Hamilton
...or to substitute its decisions as to the weight and credibility of the evidence for those of the agency.’ ” (quoting Ex parte Williamson, 907 So.2d 407, 416–17 (Ala.2004) )). The ALJ weighed L.M.'s credibility as a witness as to the allegations of misconduct between 1982 and 1994 and applie......
-
A Primer on Alabama Administrative Appeals and Judicial Deference
...quotations omitted).77. Alabama Bd. of Nursing v. Williams, 941 So. 2d 990, 999 (Ala. Civ. App. 2005) (quoting Ex parte Williamson, 907 So. 2d 407, 416-17 (Ala. 2004)).78. Dueitt, 50 So. 3d at 482 (quoting Ex parte Personnel Bd. of Jefferson County, 648 So.2d 593, 594 (Ala. Civ. App. 1994))......