Executive Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Uditsky

Decision Date16 July 1974
Docket NumberINC,73--1233,RENT-A-CA,Nos. 73--1500,s. 73--1500
Citation297 So.2d 340
PartiesEXECUTIVE, and Chicago Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Shirley UNITSKY and Richard Tarzian, etc., et al., Appellees. EXECUTIVE, and Chicago Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Meyer R. LEVINE and Richard Tarzian, etc., et al., Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Francis J. Christie, Judge.

Walsh & Dolan, Ft. Lauderdale, Underwood, Gillis, Karcher, Reiner & Gordon, Miami, for appellants.

Fowler, White, Humkey, Burnett, Hurley & Banick, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, C.J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Diversified Services, Inc. v. Jackson, 75--682
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 13, 1976
    ...indemnity from Lopez for any amount. Diversified and Pan American conceded that under this court's decision in Executive Rent-a-Car, Inc. v. Uditsky, Fla.App.1974, 297 So.2d 340, cert. denied, Fla., 310 So.2d 742 the contingent insurance clause was invalid. However, as to arguments two and ......
  • Lehman-Eastern Auto Rentals, Inc. v. Brooks
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • February 13, 1979
    ... ... We must reject this argument based upon the authorities cited in Executive Rent-A-Car, ... Inc. v. Uditsky, 297 So.2d 340 (Fla.3d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 310 So.2d 742 ... ...
  • A. United Auto Rental, Inc. v. Bradley, 76-455
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 6, 1977
    ...of its insurance. The trial court dismissed the claims for indemnity under the holding of this court in Executive Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Uditsky, 297 So.2d 340 (Fla.3d DCA 1974). When this appeal was ready for oral argument, the appellants moved for a stay of further proceedings pending (1) th......
  • American Bankers Ins. Co. of Florida v. Leatherby Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 31, 1977
    ...policy contained the typical excess clause. The court first observed that in its previous decision of Executive Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Uditsky, 297 So.2d 340 (Fla.3d DCA 1974), the contingent insurance clause had been ruled invalid. The court went on to say that because that clause was invalid......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT