Exploracion De La Estrella Soloataria Incorporacion v. Birdwell

Decision Date01 July 1993
Docket NumberNo. 11-92-253-CV,11-92-253-CV
PartiesEXPLORACION DE LA ESTRELLA SOLOATARIA INCORPORACION et al., Appellants, v. Beryl BIRDWELL and Rosalie McGlaun, Appellees.
CourtTexas Court of Appeals
OPINION

ARNOT, Justice.

This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment canceling two oil and gas leases because of cessation of production after the primary term and for failure thereafter to conduct timely and continuous reworking operations. We affirm.

On September 14, 1987, Beryl Birdwell, as lessor, executed an oil and gas lease to John Vickers, as lessee, covering the east 180 acres of the south one half of Section No. 177, Block No. 97, H & TC Ry. Co. Survey, Scurry County. The Vickers lease provided for a three-year primary term and contained the following continuous operation provision:

[I]f, after discovery of oil, gas or other minerals, the production thereof should cease from any cause, this lease shall not terminate if Lessee commences additional drilling or reworking operations within sixty (60) days thereafter, or (if it be within the primary term) commences or resumes the payment or tender of rentals on or before the rental paying date next ensuing after the expiration of three (3) months from the date of completion and abandonment of said dry hole or holes or the cessation of production.

On September 14, 1987, Rosalie McGlaun along with Beryl Birdwell, as lessors, executed an oil and gas lease to Rodger D. Allen, as lessee, covering the west 140 acres of the south one half of Section No. 177, Block No. 97, H & TC Ry. Co. Survey, Scurry County. The Allen lease, on a Producer's 88 Revised 9-64 lease form, provided for a primary term to expire on May 20, 1988. The Allen lease contained an identical continuous operation provision as included in the Vickers lease.

Mrs. Birdwell and Mrs. McGlaun brought a declaratory judgment suit seeking cancellation of the above leases because of the cessation of production, the failure to resume paying delay rentals within the primary term, and the failure to commence reworking operations within the 60-day time period. The pleadings alleged that Exploracion De La Estrella Soloataria Incorporacion (Spanish for Lone Star Exploration Incorporated) owned all of the working interest in the Vickers lease subject to a reservation of a leasehold interest (commonly called a working interest) which would vest after payout in Robert H. Rex and John Vickers. The pleadings also alleged that Mamie Jo Cope owned an overriding royalty interest in this lease. Marquis Petroleum, Inc. and Exploracion were alleged to have owned all the working interest in the Allen lease subject to the after payout interest of Rex and Vickers and the overriding royalty interest of Mamie Jo Cope. After appellants had filed their amended answer, Vickers and Rex each filed disclaimers as to any interest they might have owned in the leases.

At trial, appellants asserted that there had been continuous production and, alternatively, that there had been reworking operations that perpetuated the leases. Also, appellants contended that, by execution of division orders, Mrs. Birdwell and Mrs. McGlaun, as lessors, had revived the leases. Further, Exploracion urged that, because of the lessors' repudiation of their leases, it, as operator, was excused from conducting further operations on the leases.

The trial court found in its Finding of Fact No. 4 that the Vickers lease terminated on September 14, 1989, because of the cessation of production and in its Finding of Fact No. 6 that the Allen lease terminated on May 20, 1988, because of the cessation of production.

Because the discussion is germane to a full understanding of the underlying dispute and the other points, we will first address appellants' sixth and seventh points of error complaining that, as a matter of law, the evidence establishes that there was production for the time periods from November 1989 through June 1990 and that, as a matter of law, there were work-over operations performed on the leases that would have perpetuated the leases. 1

Karl Thiel, District Director for the Texas Railroad Commission, testified that there was one producing well on the Vickers lease. The operator of that well filed production reports with the Commission. These reports recorded production for the years 1987 and 1988; however, those reports showed no production from the years 1989, 1990, 1991, and 1992. The Commission's records showed reported production from one well on the Allen lease for 1987 and 1988 with no production reported for the years 1989, 1990, 1991, and 1992. The Commission imposed a pipeline severance on both leases and ordered both wells plugged: the well on the Vickers lease in June of 1989 and the well on the Allen lease in May of 1989.

Mrs. Birdwell said that she received royalty checks from the Vickers lease in 1987 and 1988 but did not receive any payments after that year. Mrs. McGlaun said that she received royalty payments in 1987 and 1988 from the Allen lease. Mrs. McGlaun also received one check in 1990 which was for production that occurred in 1987 or 1988 and for which the monies had been held in a suspense account by the oil purchaser.

Edward Glenn Cope testified on behalf of Exploracion and Marquis. Glenn Cope said that, in the months of September, October, November, and December of 1989, the two wells produced in paying quantities making 15 to 20 barrels of oil a month during this period. As evidence that there was production, Glenn Cope produced electrical bills for the eight months between November 1989 and June 1990 showing that the leases were supplied with and used electricity. As additional evidence that the Allen lease produced, Glenn Cope testified that the Birdwell-McGlaun well would flow without the aid of a pump but that it made more oil with a pump.

Ordinary minds could differ as to the conclusion to be drawn from the conflicting evidence of the existence of production in paying quantities. Consequently, the evidence does not conclusively establish that there was continuous production on the Vickers lease after September 14, 1989, and on the Allen lease after May 20, 1988. Appellants' sixth point of error is overruled.

The trial court also found in its Finding of Fact No. 4 that the Vickers lease terminated because of the absence of reworking operations on the lease for a period in excess of 60 consecutive days from September 14, 1989, and in its Finding of Fact No. 6 that the Allen lease terminated for failure to conduct reworking operations within 60 consecutive days after May 20, 1988. Appellants argue in their seventh point of error that, as a matter of law, reworking operations were conducted on the two leases that resulted in production which would have perpetuated the leases.

Mark Glass, Mrs. Birdwell's son-in-law, testified that he was physically on the surface covered by the two leases every few weeks and that he observed no activity, either production operations or reworking operations. Glass observed that the electric motor to the pump was running but that the belts had broken and, therefore, that the pump jack was not working. Glass offered this observation as an explanation as to why Exploracion might have received electrical bills but that the bills did not necessarily mean the well was producing. Glass said that there were some heavy rains in September of 1989. During quail season, he was out on the land and saw no fresh tire tracks. Glass stated that there was no activity on the lease in 1988 or 1989.

Glenn Cope testified that work-over operations were performed on the Allen lease and produced an invoice for work-over operations from Gladco Well Service for work performed in May of 1990. Glenn Cope also produced a bill for a down-hole pump dated May 29, 1990, from Gibco Pump and Packer that was placed in this well. Glenn Cope said that Kalko Well Service performed work-over operations on the Vickers lease in November of 1988.

However, taking as an established fact that Kalko reworked the Vickers lease in November 1988, that date is some eleven months prior to September 14, 1989, the date found by the court that the Vickers lease ceased to produce. And, the Gladco Well Service reworking of the Allen lease in May of 1990 was performed more than 60 days after September 14, 1989, the date the court found that this lease had ceased to produce. Appellants have not shown that, as a matter of law, there were reworking operations conducted on the two leases within 60 days of the cessation of production. See Samano v. Sun Oil Company, 621 S.W.2d 580 (Tex.1981); Sunray DX Oil Company v. Texaco, Inc., 417 S.W.2d 424 (Tex.Civ.App.--El Paso 1967, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Bachler v. Rosenthal, 798 S.W.2d 646 (Tex.App.--Austin 1990, writ den'd). The seventh point of error is overruled.

We will now address the first two points of error in which appellants assert that there is no evidence to prove that appellants owned the leasehold interest or overriding royalty interest. 2

A suit to cancel an oil and gas lease has been described as a suit to quiet title. McCurdy v. Morgan, 252 S.W.2d 264 (Tex.Civ.App.--San Antonio 1952, no writ); Thomason v. Ham, 210 S.W. 561 (Tex.Civ.App.--Fort Worth 1919, writ ref'd). Although he must base his action on the strength of his own title, the plaintiff in a suit to quiet title does not have to prove superior right to the property by tracing his title to the sovereignty. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Sun Oil Co., 191 F.2d 705 (5th Cir.1951); Katz v. Rodriguez, 563 S.W.2d 627 (Tex.Civ.App.--Corpus Christi 1977, writ ref'd n.r.e.).

Specifically, appellants urge that Mrs. Birdwell and Mrs. McGlaun failed to offer any competent probative evidence of any conveyances of the leases from Vickers and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Nat. Gas Pipeline Co. v. Pool
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 12 Octubre 2000
    ...1973) (quoting Hastings v. Pichinson, 370 S.W.2d 1, 4 (Tex. Civ.App.--San Antonio 1963, no writ)); Exploracion De La Estrella Soloataria Incorporacionv. Birdwell, 858 S.W.2d 549, 554 (Tex.App.--Eastland 1993, no writ). Appellants contend that by execution of division orders between 1972 and......
  • Atkinson Gas Co. v. Albrecht
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 12 Mayo 1994
    ...controversy over the validity of the lease. Kothmann v. Boley, 158 Tex. 56, 308 S.W.2d 1, 4 (1957); Exploracion de la Estrella Soloataria Incorporacion v. Birdwell, 858 S.W.2d 549, 554 (Tex.App.--Eastland 1993, no writ); Humphrey v. Seale, 716 S.W.2d 620, 623 (Tex.App.--Corpus Christi 1986,......
  • Wright v. E.P. Operating Ltd. Partnership
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 1 Octubre 1998
    ...the owner of the property. It is a suit for a specific equitable remedy. (Citations omitted)Also see Exploracion De La Estrella Soloataria Incorporacion v. Birdwell, 858 S.W.2d 549, 553 (Tex.App.--Eastland 1993, no writ), in which this court said:A suit to cancel an oil and gas lease has be......
  • Moore v. Jet Stream Investments, Ltd., No. 06-07-00106-CV (Tex. App. 6/12/2008), 06-07-00106-CV.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 12 Junio 2008
    ...of the controversy between the lessee and lessor over the validity of the lease is pending." Exploracion De La Estrella Soloataria Incorporacion v. Birdwell, 858 S.W.2d 549, 554 (Tex. App.-Eastland 1993, no writ). Moore decided, however, to continue 9. Although the record contains evidence ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Chapter 7-1 Action to Quiet Title
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Texas Commercial Causes of Action Claims Title Chapter 7 Oil and Gas Litigation
    • Invalid date
    ...984 S.W.2d 318, 333-34 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1998, pet. denied); Exploracion De La Estrella Soloataria Incorporacion v. Birdwell, 858 S.W.2d 549, 551 (Tex. App.—Eastland 1993, no writ).[8] Martin v. Amerman, 133 S.W.3d 262, 267-68 (Tex. 2004). The Texas Supreme Court held in Martin v. Amerm......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT